Seite - 39 - in Austrian Law Journal, Band 1/2019
Bild der Seite - 39 -
Text der Seite - 39 -
ALJ 2019 Digital Single Market – towards Smart Regulations 39
Although the topics discussed are very diverse, one common link between them must not be
overlooked: The suitable legal basis for the creation of a Digital Single Market will in most cases be
provided by Art. 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).8
II. Machine-learning algorithms
A. Definition, types and use cases
The first challenge for the Digital Single Market discussed in this paper is the increased use of
autonomous decision making by machine-learning algorithms in all aspects of life. In contrast to
conventional algorithms with a specified rule-based behaviour, these machine-learning algorithms
are able to learn independently and act autonomously.9 From a legal perspective, the handling of
machine-learning algorithms and their ability of making increasingly autonomous decisions is still
largely unclear. So far, there is no general codification concerning (autonomous) algorithms,10
legislation which refers to them or regulates their use only exists to a very limited extent (see also
sub-section 2.2. below).11
A major challenge in creating comprehensive legislation on algorithms is the rapid pace of
technological development, which entails the risk of creating regulations that are outdated before
even having entered into force. The difficulty of grasping this phenomenon starts with the fact that
there is no uniform definition of machine-learning algorithms which could form the basis of a legal
regulation. The exact meaning of the very broad term “algorithm” depends on the context in which
it is used.12
Machine-learning algorithms are now in use throughout our life.13 In contrast to deterministic
algorithms, machine-learning algorithms learn autonomously based on a given (training) data set.
This is to some extent comparable to the functioning of the human brain which “naturally” uses
8 Cf. also Korte, Art. 114 AEUV, in EUV/AEUV, para 161 (Calliess and Ruffert ed., 5th ed. 2016). However, the limits
set out in the jurisdiction of the CJEU (cf. in particular Case C-376/98 Federal Republic of Germany v European
Parliament and Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2000:544 and Case C-380/03 Federal Republic of
Germany v European Parliament and Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2006:772) must be observed.
9 Cf. RUSSELL AND NORVIG, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A MODERN APPROACH (3rd ed. global edition 2016).
10 Nevertheless, the question how AI could and should be regulated is already being widely discussed within the legal
community. Reed, How should we regulate artificial intelligence?, 376 PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL
SOCIETY A (2018), https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0360; Scherer, Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks,
Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies, 29 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY 354 (2016); Yeung, Algorithmic
Regulation: A Critical Interrogation, 12 REGULATION & GOVERNANCE 505 (2018).
11 Algorithms are mentioned explicitly in Sec 14 of the Austrian regulation on gambling machines
(Automatenglücksspielverordnung). This provision refers to the use of an algorithm in the context of the
determination of game results. Further examples in the Austrian legal system are Sec 11 of the Stock Exchange
Act 2018 (BörseG 2018) and Sec 12 of the Federal Equal Treatment Act (B-GlBG). The German law professor von
Lewinski recently attempted to arrange the punctually existing regulations of algorithmic law in the form of a
matrix with the aim of bringing order into a new field of law (cf. von Lewinski, Regulierungsbedarf und
Regulierungsfelder von algorithmischen Systemen, ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR INNOVATIONS- UND TECHNIKRECHT 168 [2018]).
12 Cf. different perspectives in Mohabbat Kar, Thapa and Parycek (ed.), (Un)berechenbar? Algorithmen und
Automatisierung in Staat und Gesellschaft (2018) Fraunhofer-Institut für Offene Kommunikationssysteme FOKUS,
Kompetenzzentrum Öffentliche IT https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57518-2.
13 Cf. Makridakis, The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms, 90 FUTURES 46
(2017).
zurück zum
Buch Austrian Law Journal, Band 1/2019"
Austrian Law Journal
Band 1/2019
- Titel
- Austrian Law Journal
- Band
- 1/2019
- Autor
- Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
- Herausgeber
- Brigitta Lurger
- Elisabeth Staudegger
- Stefan Storr
- Ort
- Graz
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- Abmessungen
- 19.1 x 27.5 cm
- Seiten
- 126
- Schlagwörter
- Recht, Gesetz, Rechtswissenschaft, Jurisprudenz
- Kategorien
- Zeitschriften Austrian Law Journal