Seite - 70 - in Austrian Law Journal, Band 2/2017
Bild der Seite - 70 -
Text der Seite - 70 -
ALJ 2/2017 Philipp Anzenberger / Tjaša Ivanc 70
(Art. 34 para. 1 point b subpoint iv EAPO Regulation). Challenging a “foreign” interim measure (to
be enforced according to the Brussels Ia Regulation) is thus significantly more difficult than
contesting an EAPO in the Member State of enforcement.
V. Conclusion
The efficiency of legal interim measures for cross-border debt recovery62 in civil and commercial
matters across Europe was significantly increased with the Brussels I recast and the EAPO Regu-
lation. In particular, the new grounds for enforcing ex parte interim measures grant the creditor a
certain surprise effect and thus provide a realistic chance to prevent the withdrawal or transfer
of funds held by the debtor. The effects of an interim measure to be enforced within the Brus-
sels Ia regime are mostly determined by the law of the Member State of origin, whereas the ef-
fects of an EAPO at least partly depend on the legal situation of the Member State of enforce-
ment. The choice of the most suitable way to freeze the debtor’s bank accounts will therefore
significantly vary from case to case.
62 There has been concern regarding cross-border recovery of debt collection shown in the professional environ-
ment; cf. Vesna Rijavec, Jorg Sladič & José Caramelo Gomes, Introductory chapter, in SIMPLIFICATION OF DEBT COLLEC-
TION IN THE EU 1, 1 et seq. (Vesna Rijavec, Tjaša Ivanc & Tomaž Keresteš eds., 2014).
zurück zum
Buch Austrian Law Journal, Band 2/2017"
Austrian Law Journal
Band 2/2017
- Titel
- Austrian Law Journal
- Band
- 2/2017
- Autor
- Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
- Herausgeber
- Brigitta Lurger
- Elisabeth Staudegger
- Stefan Storr
- Ort
- Graz
- Datum
- 2017
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- Abmessungen
- 19.1 x 27.5 cm
- Seiten
- 108
- Schlagwörter
- Recht, Gesetz, Rechtswissenschaft, Jurisprudenz
- Kategorien
- Zeitschriften Austrian Law Journal