Seite - (000097) - in Autonomes Fahren - Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte

85References 44. Sinnott-Armstrong, W.: Consequentialism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato. stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/ (2011). Accessed 8 July 2014 45. Smith, B.W.: Planning for the obsolescence of technologies not yet invented. Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/10/plan- ning-obsolescence-technologies-not-yet-invented (2013). Accessed 8 July 2014 46. Sternstein, A.: Why Feds are still buying IT that works with Windows XP. Nextgov. http://www. nextgov.com/cio-briefing/2014/04/why-feds-are-still-buying-it-works-windows-xp/81667/ (2014). Accessed 8 July 2014 47. Thomson, J.J.: Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist 59, 204–217 (1976) 48. Transportation Research Board: Animal-vehicle collision data collection. http://onlinepubs.trb. org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_370.pdf (2007). Accessed 8 July 2014 49. Villasenor, J.: Product liability and driverless cars: issues and guiding principles for legisla- tion. Report by The Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2014/04/ products-liability-driverless-cars-villasenor (2014). Accessed 8 July 2014 50. Waterfield, B. and Day, M.: EU has secret plan for police to ‘remote stop’ cars. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10605328/EU-has-secret-plan-for-po- lice-to-remote-stop-cars.html (2014). Accessed 8 July 2014 51. Wu, S.: Unmanned vehicles and US product liability law. Journal of Law, Information & Science 21(2), 234–254 (2012) 52. Yeomans, G.: Autonomous vehicles: handing over control – opportunities and risk for insur- ance. Report by Lloyd’s. Lloyd’s, London. http://www.lloyds.com/~/media/lloyds/reports/emerg- ing%20risk%20reports/autonomous%20vehicles%20final.pdf (2014). Accessed 8 July 2014