Seite - (000752) - in Autonomes Fahren - Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte

729Literatur tige Studien sollten des Weiteren untersuchen, wie durch automatisierte Fahrzeuge ausge- löste kritische Vorfälle von Konsumenten wahrgenommen werden und wie ihre Wahrneh- mungen von den involvierten Marken abhängen. Schließlich sollte die Studie in anderen Kontexten (beispielsweise Ländermärkten) repliziert werden, um mehr über mögliche wei- tere Rahmenbedingungen der Nutzungsbereitschaft automatisierter Fahrzeuge zu erfahren. Literatur 1. Aaker D (1996) Building Strong Brands. New York: Free Press 2. Albrecht CM, Backhaus C, Gurzki H, Woisetschläger DM (2013) Drivers of Brand Extension Success: What Really Matters for Luxury Brands. Psychology & Marketing 30(8), 647–659 3. Araujo L, Mason K, Spring M (2012) Self-driving cars: A case study in making new markets, Lancaster University 4. Arras KO, Cerqui D (2005). Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 peo- ple survey (No. LSA-REPORT-2005-002) 5. Beiker SA (2012) Legal Aspects of Autonomous Driving. Santa Clara L. Rev. 52(4), 1145–1156 6. Brehm JW, Brehm SS (1981) Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press 7. Berger C (2012) From Autonomous Vehicles to Safer Cars: Selected Challenges for the Software Engineering. In Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 180–189 8. Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Meuter ML (2002) Implementing Successful Self-Service Technologies. The Academy of Management Executive 16(4), 96–108 9. Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(4), 319–330 10. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2012) Winning the Race with Ever-Smarter Machines. MIT Sloan Management Review 53(2), 53–60 11. Burns LD (2013) Sustainable mobility: A vision of our transport future. Nature 497(7448), 181–182 12. Cairns S, Harmer C, Hopkin J, Skippon S (2014) Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities: A review. Transportation research part A: policy and practice 63, 107–117 13. Carlson MS, Desai M, Drury JL, Kwak H, Yanco HA (2013). Identifying Factors that Influence Trust in Automated Cars and Medical Diagnosis Systems 14. Chen H, Gong X, HU YF, LIU QF, GAO BZ, GUO HY (2013) Automotive Control: the State of the Art and Perspective. Acta Automatica Sinica 39 (4), 322–346 15. Curran JM, Meuter ML, Surprenant CF (2003) Intentions to Use Self-Service Technologies: AConfluence of Multiple Attitudes. Journal of Service Research 5 (3), 209–224 16. Curran JM, Meuter ML (2005) Self-service technology adoption: comparing three technologies. Journal of Services Marketing 19(2), 103–113 17. Dabholkar PA, Bagozzi RP (2002) An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30(3), 184–201 18. Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters ML, Koay KL, Werry I (2005) What is a Robot Companion-Friend, Assistant or Butler?. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005 (IROS 2005). 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference, 1192–1197 19. Epprecht N, von Wirth T, Stünzi C, Blumer YB (2014) Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes: How acceptability matters. Futures 60, 30–40