Seite - (000077) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Bild der Seite - (000077) -
Text der Seite - (000077) -
The increasing complexity of the challenges, particularly with regard to their
impacts onpoor andvulnerable populations, requires a rethinkingof our approach
toR4D. CGIARhas taken on this challenge by broadening its portfolio ofmajor
newinitiativesforstrategicresearch.Afirst roundofsomehalf-a-dozen âChallenge
Programsâwere mandated to develop new R4Dmodels over a period of up to
10years, starting in2002(CGIAR2015b).Box4.2describesoneexampleof these
programs, focusingonwater and food.
Box4.2:ChallengeProgramonWaterandFood
The CGIAR Challenge Program onWater and Food (CPWF) piloted new
ways of increasing the resilience of social and ecological systems through
better water management for food production. From 2002 to 2013, the
program supported more than 120 research projects in ten of the worldâs
largest river basins (Hall et al. 2014; Harrington and Fisher 2014). The
program early on developed IPs and theories of change for its R4D river
basin programs. FromaMonitoring andEvaluation (M&E) perspective this
includedresults-basedandadaptivemanagementaswell as learning-oriented
approaches. The insights and knowledge gained fromCPWFâs 12 years of
work are being integrated into anotherCGIARResearchProgramonWater,
Land andEcosystems.
In a second round, from2010onwards, 16CGIARResearchPrograms (CRPs)
were set up in a 5-yearfirst phase (CGIAR2015c).Themajor reorientation of the
R4Dportfoliowas in themove fromanoutput focus to anoutcome focus.Success
wasnowtobemeasured in termsof theCRPâs contribution tobehavioral changes,
manifested inchanges inknowledge,attitudesandskillsandpracticesofawideset
ofnon-researchnextusers, includingdevelopmentpractitioners, farmersandpolicy
makers.
Through approaches such as results-basedmanagement, theories of change and
impact pathways, the term outcome came into focus. Organizations such as the
InternationalDevelopmentResearchCenter(IDRC)wereearlydevelopersofM&E
tools to capture andmeasureoutcomes through their âOutcomeMappingâmethod-
ology (Earl et al. 2001).WithinCGIAR, âParticipatory ImpactPathwaysAnalysisâ
(PIPA) (Douthwaite et al. 2003, 2007)was developed under theCPWF tounpack
processes andmechanisms in the realmofoutcomes.
Towards the endof thefirst phase, 4 of the 16CGIARresearch programswere
tasked to develop a comprehensive, suitable and lean results-based management
approach for research for development, initially for a period of 12months. The
followingsectiondescribeshowtheCGIARResearchProgramonClimateChange,
AgricultureandFoodSecurity (CCAFS)developedand implemented itsRBMtrial
andhighlights themain lessons learnt.
58 T.Schuetz et al.
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Titel
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Autoren
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Verlag
- Springer Open
- Datum
- 2017
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 365
- Schlagwörter
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Kategorien
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima