Seite - (000090) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Bild der Seite - (000090) -
Text der Seite - (000090) -
Amodular systemcanbestmeet thedemandsof theprogramasawhole and its
projects, aswell as thewider CGIAR system (see below; Thornton et al. 2014d).
SomeelementsareprescribedbyCGIARgovernancebodies, includingthecarrying
out of baselines, independent impact assessments, and periodic external evalua-
tions. Programmatic flexibility existswithin the day-to-day operationalMEL, as a
system is required that allows enough flexibility and adaptability to be applied to
the different types of projects andprograms.
CCAFShas identified the followingmodules toguide itsMELsystem(Schuetz
et al. 2014g):
Harmonization of TOCs: the framework for thismodular approach is set through
theTOCdevelopmentacrossCCAFSthematicandregionaloperations,describ-
inghowCCAFSflagships, regions andprojects anticipate changes in next-user
behavior and practices, and their role in it. Investment in the development,
harmonization and use of IPs and more elaborated TOC: (1) ensures that
CCAFSplan ofwork is targeted at achieving outcomes and requires that tasks
addressing the ‘useofoutputs’arebuilt into eachactivityplan; (2) strategically
encourages communication and collaboration among colleagues within
research, regions and projects and guides exchanges across disciplines and
regions; and (3) revisits the trajectory of CCAFS contributions to change and
uses themas an ex-ante impact assessment.
Indicators &Baselines: In preparation for a harmonization process, as described
above, indicatorsandoutcometargetnumbers towhichtheprogramandprojects
will be held accountable were defined by the regional and research program
leaders. The regionally and thematically aggregated targetswere then checked
againstwhat individualprojectsproposed tocontribute towardsanagreedsetof
targetvalues.Additionally, aprogrammaticbaselineat site levelwasconducted
at the beginning of the program to be able to compare achievements against
these later on,with respect tobehavior andpractice changeof farmers. Further-
more, projects are responsible for conducting specific baselines to monitor
progress over timewithin their respective thematic and regional foci.
Reflexivespaces&activities:Theseneedtobebuilt insystematically toensure that
the key elements of adaptivemanagement are operationalized. Adaptiveman-
agement provides for flexibility and corrective actions to strengthen predictive
capacity, which is essential whenworking in a constantly changing, complex
environment. In working with TOCs, we make assumptions as to how we
anticipatechangewillhappen,butweknowthatchangedoesnotalwayshappen
as predicted, and so reflexive spaces are critical for allowing us tomakewell-
documented and well-justified adjustments in response to the insights gained
throughourwork.
Planning and reporting support: First, an online planning and reporting platform
(P&R)collects project informationat project inception, so that projects popula-
tion the system once, and build on this for follow-up planning, reporting and
learning. Project teams are guided in their TOCs/IPs-building from the begin-
ninganduse thisasbasis formonitoringannualprogress.Thematicandregional
4 Pathway to Impact: Supporting andEvaluatingEnablingEnvironments for. . . 71
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Titel
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Autoren
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Verlag
- Springer Open
- Datum
- 2017
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 365
- Schlagwörter
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Kategorien
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima