Seite - (000144) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Bild der Seite - (000144) -
Text der Seite - (000144) -
Capacity building under the JCM is amust to ensure appropriatemanagement
andMRV implementation on the ground.Although capacity building is not regu-
lated under the JCM, and surprisingly does not seem to be the main interest of
project participants, it should be required from feasibility study phase to project
implementation including on equipment use and maintenance training for
end-users. The partner countries may also provide recommendations on project-
level capacity building strategies. Attractive information media are always
beneficial.
Ultimately, there is a need for an overarching framework for ensuring sustain-
abledevelopmentcontribution.Atpresent, aguidelineofSustainableDevelopment
Criteriahasbeen releasedby theJointCommitteebetweenJapanandIndonesia for
ex-ante and ex-post evaluation on the JCM projects contribution to sustainable
development. The guideline assesses the benefits of each JCM project to the
environment, economy, social conditions, and technological improvement. It con-
sists of a Sustainable Development Implementation Plan (SDIP) and Sustainable
Development ImplementationReport (SDIR). Project participants are required to
evaluate their own project using SDIP, which identifies potential impact of the
project through a negative/exclusion checklist. After a chosen period, the project
participantdevelopaSDIRtoreport theimpactof theirproject,oroutcomesoftheir
SDIP, and review the contribution of their project to sustainable development,
especiallyat theproject areaand its surrounding.TheSDIPandSDIRareessential
to integrate the JCMprojects into thebroaderenvironmental, economic, andsocial
impact management of the hosting entity, as well as to assess the co-benefits of
projects.
TheSDIPandSDIRare reviewedby the JointCommittee.The three registered
projectswere approved before adoption of these guidelines, but theymay still be
required to submit theirplans.Thisprocedure is applicable for all selectedprojects
before they are registered by the Joint Committee. Availability of this procedure
should be seen as an opportunity for the JCM to improve the sustainability assur-
ance of projects in market-based mechanisms. There are benefits for the project
participants, too, inpreventing theproject risks.Theseguidelinescouldbemadeas
amandatory part of submission. The application of similar guideline in the other
partner countries and a procedure for grievance/complaints from stakeholders
during project should also be considered as a followupofSDIPandSDIR.
The collective evaluationon these project-basedSDIPs andSDIRsby the Joint
Committee or the Japanese government may be used to evaluate contribution
to sustainable development at mechanisms-level for the JCM.27 Negotiations
under the Article 6 of the Paris Agreement could consider the development of
27Mapping the Indicators: An Analysis of Sustainable Development Requirements of Selected
MarketMechanisms andMultilateral Institutions. Berlin: German Emissions TradingAuthority
(DEHSt) at theFederalEnvironmentAgency.
126 A.Amellina
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Titel
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Autoren
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Verlag
- Springer Open
- Datum
- 2017
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 365
- Schlagwörter
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Kategorien
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima