Seite - (000279) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Bild der Seite - (000279) -
Text der Seite - (000279) -
biophysicaloutcomesfromadaptationactivitieshasbeen themostcontroversial
aspect ofmonitoring andevaluating adaptation.Because adaptation takesplace
inaneconomicdevelopmentcontext,adaptationmetricsshouldnotbedefinedin
isolation from changes in farmers’ behavior. Otherwise, there is a high risk of
measuring development indicators rather than adaptation indicators. Knowing
domainswhere adaptation-relevant behavioral changes have been initiated and
maintainedwould be helpful for evaluators to trace adaptation components in
development outcomes, and reduce risks of confounding adaptation and devel-
opment effects.
14.4 Needs for IncorporatingBehavioralTheory into
AdaptationM&EApproaches
Several authors Olivier et al. (2012) andBours et al. (2013) have recognized the
need for modifying conventionalM&E approaches tomeet the needs of climate
changeadaptationprograms.Theyadvocateagreater results-orientation inclimate
change adaptation interventions. However, there have been minor differences
between most attempts to do so and conventional interventions. This may be
because designing adaptation projects and appropriate M&E systems requires
robust understanding of both adaptation to climate change (Olivier et al. 2012)
and behavioral theory. In fact, the differences between adaptation-related and
developmentoutcomeswill dependonwhethernewpatternsofbehaviors, actions,
activities and relationships have been initiated and maintained by stakeholders,
including smallholder farmers, policy-makers, researchers and agricultural exten-
sionofficers.
It appears important tomainstream behavioral theory into results-basedmoni-
toring and evaluation of adaptation, because adaptation comes through various
domains of behavioral changes.Behavioral theory is compatiblewith any existing
tools, frameworksandapproachesusedinadaptationinterventionprogramsandthe
associatedM&E. In addition to assisting projectmanagers to refine existingM&E
frameworks, the application of behavioral theorywill contribute to strengthening
communities’ownershipof thebiophysical changes inducedbyadaptationactions.
Resultsof this researchareconsistentwithconclusionsbyGiffordetal. (2011) that
behaviorscienceiscrucial forconfrontingthecomplexchallengesposedbyclimate
change.Knowledge of human behavior, cognitions, and psychological adaptation
can also help the integration of derived adaptation-relevant indicators with those
producedby researchers in related social andnatural science disciplines.
Threemajor conclusions can be drawn from this research. First, an adaptation
process leads to behavioral changes of the beneficiaries. These changes span
variousdomainsofcommunity life,whichmaygobeyondadoptionof technologies
in the targeted sector.Theymayormaynotbeadaptation-relevant, but allmustbe
addressed to strengthen adaptation capacities or avoidmal-adaptation. Secondly,
14 AdaptationProcesses inAgriculture andFoodSecurity: Insights from. . . 265
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Titel
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Autoren
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Verlag
- Springer Open
- Datum
- 2017
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 365
- Schlagwörter
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Kategorien
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima