Web-Books
im Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Control Theory Tutorial - Basic Concepts Illustrated by Software Examples
Seite - (000066) -
  • Benutzer
  • Version
    • Vollversion
    • Textversion
  • Sprache
    • Deutsch
    • English - Englisch

Seite - (000066) - in Control Theory Tutorial - Basic Concepts Illustrated by Software Examples

Bild der Seite - (000066) -

Bild der Seite - (000066) - in Control Theory Tutorial - Basic Concepts Illustrated by Software Examples

Text der Seite - (000066) -

7.2 Uncertainty:DistanceBetweenSystems 59 Read this as theguaranteed stabilitymargin for the alternativeprocess is at least as goodasthestabilitymarginfornominalprocessminusthedistancebetweenthenom- inal and alternative processes.A small distance between processes, δν, guarantees that thealternativeprocess isnearlyas robustly stableas theoriginalprocess. Thedefinitions in this sectiondependon thedistancemeasure, expressedas δ(c1,c2)= |c1−c2|√ 1+|c1|2 √ 1+|c2|2 . Here, c1 and c2 are complexnumbers.Transfer functions return complexnumbers. Thus,wecanuse this function toevaluateδ[P1(jω),P2(jω)]. 7.3 RobustStabilityandRobustPerformance ThestabilitymarginbP,C measures theamountbywhichPmaybealteredandstill allow the system to remain stable.Note thatbP,C inEq. 7.6 expresses aminimum value of δ over all frequencies. Thus,wemay also think of bP,C as themaximum valueof1/δoverall frequencies. Themaximum value of magnitude over all frequencies matches the definition of theH∞ norm, suggesting that maximizing the stability margin corresponds to minimizing some expression for anH∞ norm. Indeed, there is such anH∞ norm expression for bP,C. However, the particular form is beyond our scope. The point hereisthatrobuststabilityviamaximizationofbP,C fallswithintheH∞normtheory, as in the smallgain theorem. Stability is just one aspect of design. Typically, a stable systemmust alsomeet otherobjectives,suchasrejectionofdisturbanceandnoiseperturbations.Thissection shows that increasing the stabilitymarginhas theassociatedbenefitof improvinga system’s rejectionofdisturbanceandnoise.Often,adesign that targets reductionof theH∞normgains thebenefitsofanincreasedstabilitymarginandbetter regulation through rejectionofdisturbanceandnoise. The previous section on regulation showed that a feedback loop reduces its response to perturbations by lowering its various sensitivities, as in Eqs. 6.2 and 6.5.Afeedback loop’s sensitivity isS=1/(1+PC)and itscomplementarysensi- tivity isT = PC/(1+PC). Increasing the stabilitymargin, bP,C, reduces a system’s overall sensitivity.We cansee the relationbetweenstabilityandsensitivityby rewriting theexpression for bP,C as bP,C = [ max ω √ |S|2+|CS|2+|PS|2+|T|2 ]−1 This expression shows that increasingbP,C reduces the totalmagnitudeof the four keysensitivitymeasures fornegative feedback loops.
zurück zum  Buch Control Theory Tutorial - Basic Concepts Illustrated by Software Examples"
Control Theory Tutorial Basic Concepts Illustrated by Software Examples
Titel
Control Theory Tutorial
Untertitel
Basic Concepts Illustrated by Software Examples
Autor
Steven A. Frank
Verlag
Springer Open
Ort
Irvine
Datum
2018
Sprache
englisch
Lizenz
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-319-91706-1
Abmessungen
15.5 x 23.5 cm
Seiten
114
Schlagwörter
Control Theory --- Engineering Design Tradeoffs, Robust Control, Feedback Control Systems, Wolfram
Kategorie
Informatik
Web-Books
Bibliothek
Datenschutz
Impressum
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Control Theory Tutorial