Seite - 221 - in Digital Entrepreneurship - Impact on Business and Society
Bild der Seite - 221 -
Text der Seite - 221 -
demandandprovidingvaluable alternatives for entrepreneurial ventures at different
stages of development.While P2P lending is better suited for both traditional and
established businesseswith existing revenue streams but need of small, short-term
loans to meet monthly loan repayments or for small investments (Fenwick et al.
2018), other formsof crowdfundingarebetter suited for early-stage riskier ventures
inneed for capital to fund their prototypeor initial growth (Harrison2013).Similar
to crowdfunding, token offerings are particularly attractive for early-stage ventures
although mostly suited to platform-based businesses and have been adopted by
start-ups aiming to avoid the complicated and costly auditing, and regulatory
burdenof traditional fundingmodels (Tasca 2019), they are also typically larger in
scale than traditional crowdfunding.
While new Internet-enabled funding mechanisms, such as crowdfunding and
token offerings, have the potential to transform entrepreneurial finance and play a
significant role in creating a level global playing field for access to funding, it
remains concentrated in a small number ofmarkets and raises a number of public
policy issues, not least investor protection. The trajectory of these financing
innovations is only going oneway.Whether theywill replace or complement the
existing funding cycle remains to be seen.
References
Adhami, S., Giudici, G., &Martinazzi, S. (2018).Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical
analysis of initial coin offerings. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 64–75.
Agrawal,A.,Catalini,C.,&Goldfarb,A. (2015).Crowdfunding:Geography, socialnetworks, and
the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2),
253–274.
Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding
(No. w16820). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Altman,E. I., Esentato,M.,&Sabato,G. (2018).Assessing the creditworthiness of ItalianSMEs
andmini-bond issuers.Global Finance Journal, 43, 100450.
Aspen REIT. (2017, November 14). Aspen REIT, Inc. Files for Initial Public Offering;
TargetsNYSEAmericanListing. PressRelease. https://www.businesswirechina.com/en/news/
36375.html. Accessed 7 July 2019.
Barsan, I.M. (2017).Legal challengesof initial coinofferings (ICO).RevueTrimestrielle deDroit
Financier (RTDF), 3, 54–65.
Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., Kamuriwo, D. S., &Vanacker, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial finance:
New frontiers of research and practice: Venture Capital 19 (1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.
1080/13691066.2016.1259733.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right
crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.
Benedetti, H., & Kostovetsky, L. (2018). Digital tulips? Returns to investors in initial coin
offerings (May 20, 2018).
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of
private equity and debtmarkets in thefinancial growth cycle. Journal of Banking&Finance,
22(6), 613–673.
Bhide,A. (2003).Theorigin and evolution of newbusiness. NewYork:OxfordUniversity Press.
NewSources of Entrepreneurial Finance 227
Digital Entrepreneurship
Impact on Business and Society
- Titel
- Digital Entrepreneurship
- Untertitel
- Impact on Business and Society
- Autoren
- Mariusz Soltanifar
- Mathew Hughes
- Lutz Göcke
- Verlag
- Springer Verlag
- Ort
- Cham
- Datum
- 2021
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-53914-6
- Abmessungen
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Seiten
- 340
- Schlagwörter
- Entrepreneurship, IT in Business, Innovation/Technology Management, Business and Management, Open Access, Digital transformation and entrepreneurship, ICT based business models
- Kategorie
- International