Page - 152 - in Der Arkadenhof der Universität Wien und die Tradition der Gelehrtenmemoria in Europa
Image of the Page - 152 -
Text of the Page - 152 -
the singular image of the deceased on his tomb.
At times these forms mix, as in the case of bust
portraits on sepulchral monuments. One such case will be the focus of the following investi-
gation.
simile al vivo quanto sia possibile:
a scholar’s tomb as ‘think space’
In his major publication on the history of Italian
tomb monuments, Fritz Burger’s Die Geschichte
des Florentinischen Grabmals of 1904, the author
emphasizes the key position of the monument to
Leonardo Salutati in the Fiesole Cathedral (Fig.
1): For the first time ever in the Renaissance, Bur-
ger states, a tomb monument appears as ‘Den-
kmal in des Wortes eigentlichster Bedeutung’,
as a memorial in the truest sense of the word.11
Denkmal literally translated means as much as:
a monument to think about – and a place that
is both one of remembrance and one to remem-
ber. Burger’s brief observation about the Salu-
tati monument as a think-space, uttered more
than a century ago, provides a keynote for the
following short case study, which presents some
new suggestions on the Salutati Chapel’s iconog-
raphy and reevaluates the remarkable tomb’s vis-
ual strategies in engaging the beholder; it does so
in an intriguingly innovative way, using the aes-
thetics and the appeal of bust portraiture to ‘pro-
duce’ and ‘perform’ the perpetual memoria of an
eminent cleric and scholar.
Surprisingly, the Salutati tomb – unique
and aesthetically appealing as it is – is not dis-
cussed in most standard publications on tomb
monuments.12 It is briefly mentioned in a few publications dedicated to its sculptor, Mino
da Fiesole, where it is generally characterized
as a problem case with an obscure iconog-
raphy.13 Part of the reason for this lack of atten-
tion might be its somewhat remote place in the
Fig. 1: Mino da Fiesole, Tomb monument for Leonardo Sa-
lutati, 1464–1466, marble, Cathedral San Romolo, Fiesole.
jeanette
kohl152
11 F. Burger, Geschichte des florentinischen Grabmals von den ältesten Zeiten bis Michelangelo, Strassburg 1904, p.
217. Despite a multitude of publications on individual tombs, there is no more recent comprehensive publication
dedicated to Renaissance tomb monuments in Florence.
12 It is briefly mentioned in P. Schubring, Die italienische Plastik des Quattrocento, Berlin 1919, p. 163 and in J.
Poeschke, Die Skulptur der Renaissance in Italian, vol. 1: Donatello und seine Zeit, Munich 1990, p. 143. J. Pope-
Hennessy in his canonical volume Italian Renaissance Sculpture, London 1958, discusses in his chapter on The
Humanist Tomb the monuments to Benozzo Federighi and Margrave Hugo – both by Mino da Fiesole – but does
not mention the Salutati tomb. The same applies for more recent publications, which discuss Renaissance tombs,
such as J. T. Paoletti/G. M. Radke, Art in Renaissance Italy, London 1997.
13 It is briefly discussed in G.C. Sciolla, La scultura di Mino da Fiesole, Turin 1970, and in S. E. Zuraw, The Sculp-
Open Access © 2018 by BÖHLAU VERLAG GMBH & CO.KG, WIEN KÖLN WEIMAR
back to the
book Der Arkadenhof der Universität Wien und die Tradition der Gelehrtenmemoria in Europa"
Der Arkadenhof der Universität Wien und die Tradition der Gelehrtenmemoria in Europa
- Title
- Der Arkadenhof der Universität Wien und die Tradition der Gelehrtenmemoria in Europa
- Editor
- Ingeborg Schemper-Sparholz
- Martin Engel
- Andrea Mayr
- Julia Rüdiger
- Publisher
- Böhlau Verlag
- Location
- WIEN · KÖLN · WEIMAR
- Date
- 2018
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-205-20147-2
- Size
- 18.5 x 26.0 cm
- Pages
- 428
- Keywords
- Scholars‘ monument, portrait sculpture, pantheon, hall of honour, university, Denkmal, Ehrenhalle, Memoria, Gelehrtenmemoria, Pantheon, Epitaph, Gelehrtenporträt, Büste, Historismus, Universität
- Categories
- Geschichte Chroniken