Page - (000134) - in Autonomes Fahren - Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte

Wechselwirkung Mensch und autonomer Agent122 den Blick auf die Landschaft genießen. Wie stabil und valide diese Aussagen im tatsäch- lichen Umgang mit automatisierten Fahrzeugen sind, werden zukünftige Studien zeigen müssen. Vielleicht steht dieses Bedürfnis aber auch in der Tradition deutscher Romantik und bietet einen neuen Impuls für die Gestaltung des automatisierten, „naturnahen“ Raums. Literatur 1. Wilson, J.R., Rutherford, A.: Mental Models: Theory and Application in Human Factors. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 31, 617–634 (1989) 2. Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. In: Johannsen, G. (ed.) Analysis, design and evaluation of man-machine systems. pp. 151–157. Pergamon (1982) 3. Norman, D.: The “problem” with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not “over-automation.”Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 327, 585–593 (1990) 4. Sheridan, T.B.: Supervisory control. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of human factors. pp. 1243–1268. Wiley, New York (1987) 5. Boeing Commercial Airline Group: Statistical summary of commercial jet aircraft accidents: Worldwide operations 1959–2005., http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf 6. Dismukes, R.K., Berman, B.A., Loukopoulos, L.D.: The Limits of Expertise: Rethinking Pilot Error and the Causes of Airline Accidents. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Federal (2007) 7. Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of Automation. Automatica. 19, 775–779 (1983) 8. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37, 381–394 (1995) 9. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A.: Similarities and differences between human – human and human – automation trust: an integrative review. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 8, 277–301 (2007) 10. Onnasch, L., Wickens, C.D., Li, H., Manzey, D.: Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 56, 476–488 (2013) 11. Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. pp. 528–542. Wiley, New York (2006) 12. Endsley, M.R., Bolte, B., Jones, D.G.: Designing for situation awareness: An approach to human-centered design. Taylor & Francis, London (2003) 13. Billings, C.E.: Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Human Factors in Transportation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers (1997) 14. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interac- tion with automation. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans, IEEE Trans. 30, 286–297 (2000) 15. Christoffersen, K., Woods, D.D.: How to make automated systems team players. In: Salas, E. (ed.) Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research. pp. 1–12. Elsevier Science Ltd. (2002) 16. Kaber, D.B., Riley, J.M., Tan, K.-W., Endsley, M.R.: On the Design of Adaptive Automation for Complex Systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 5, 37–57 (2001) 17. Inagaki, T.: Traffic systems as joint cognitive systems: issues to be solved for realizing human-technology coagency. Cogn. Technol. Work. 12, 153–162 (2010) 18. Prevot, T., Homola, J.R., Martin, L.H., Mercer, J.S., Cabrall, C.D.: Toward Automated Air Traffic Control – Investigating a Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Human/Systems Interaction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 28, 77–98 (2012) 19. Challenger, R., Clegg, C.W., Shepherd, C.: Function allocation in complex systems: reframing an old problem. Ergonomics. 56, 1051–69 (2013)