Page - (000611) - in Autonomes Fahren - Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte

591References 5. Berenson, Alex, Vioxx Verdict Raises Profile of Texas Lawyer, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 22, 2005, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/22/business/22lawyer.html?pagewanted=all 6. Beyer, David et al., Risk Product Liability Trends, Triggers, and Insurance in Commercial Aerial Robots 20 (Apr. 5, 2014) (describing nascent insurance coverage for drones), available at http:// robots.law.miami.edu/2014/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Beyer-Dulo-Townsley-and-Wu_ Unmanned-Systems-Liability-and-Insurance-Trends_WE-ROBOT-2014-Conference.pdf 7. Bookout v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. CJ-2008-7969 (Okl. Dist. Ct. Okl. Cty. dismissed Nov. 20, 2013) 8. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq., 17500 et seq. 9. Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq. 10. CBS News and Associated Press, Toyota “Unintended Acceleration” Has Killed 89, CBS NEWS (May 25, 2010), http://www.cbsnews.com/news/toyota-unintended-acceleration-has-killed-89/ 11. Dowle, Mark, Pinto Madness, MOTHER JONES, Sept. 1977, available at http://www.motherjones. com/print/15406 12. Fletcher, Michael & Mufson, Steven, Why did GM take so long to respond to deadly defect? Corporate culture may hold answer, WASH. POST, Mar. 30, 2014, available at http:// www. washingtonpost.com/business/economy/why-did-gm-take-...swer/2014/03/30/5c366f6c-b691- 11e3-b84e-897d3d12b816_story.html 13. FRUMER, LOUIS R., ET AL, PRODUCTS LIABILITY §§ 1.02, 2.04, 2.05[1], 5.01, 8.04 (2014) 14. Girion, Lisa and Calvo, Dana, Merck Loses Vioxx Case, L.A. TIMES, Aug. 20, 2005, available at http://articles.latimes.com/2005/aug/20/business/fi-vioxx20 15. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal. App. 3d 757, 771–72, 813, 823–24 (1981) 16. Hendler, John, email to Lori Queen et al. (Sept. 28, 2005, 4:07 pm), http://docs.house.gov/ meetings/IF/IF02/20140618/102345/HHRG-113-IF02-20140618-SD036.pdf 17. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (1960) 18. Hirsch, Jerry, After losing verdict, Toyota settles in sudden acceleration case, L.A. TIMES, Oct. 25, 2013, available at http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/25/autos/la-fi-hy-toyota-settles- sudden-acceleration-20131025 19. Isidore, Chris, GM to pay victims at least $400 million, CNN MONEY, Jul. 24, 2014, available at http://money.cnn.com/2014/07/24/news/companies/gm-earnings-recall/ 20. Krisher, Tom, GM’s ignition switch: what went wrong, COLUMBUS DISPATCH, Jul. 8, 2014, avail- able at http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2014/07/08/gms-ignition-switch- what-went-wrong.html 21. Lloyd’s, Autonomous Vehicles Handing Over Control: Opportunities and Risks for Insurance 8 (2014) 22. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) 23. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Ernst, 296 S.W.3d 81 (Tex. Ct. App. 2009), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1980 (2012) 24. Minick, Robert D. & Kagehiro, Dorothy K., Understanding Juror Emotions: Anger Management in the Courtroom, FOR THE DEFENSE, July 2004, at 2, 3 (emphasis added), available at http://www. krollontrack.com/publications/tg_forthedefense_robertminick-dorothyhagehiro070104.pdf 25. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems 57–60, 62–64 (Feb. 2011); see NASA Engineering and Safety Center, Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration Investigation 170–172 (Jan. 18, 2011) 26. Romero, Ric, Sudden Acceleration Issue Spans Beyond Toyota, 6ABC.COM (Jan. 4, 2010), http://6abc.com/archive/7200572/ 27. Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10-ML-2151 JVS (FMO) (C.D. Cal. filed Apr. 12, 2010) (cases consolidated