Page - 430 - in Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change
Image of the Page - 430 -
Text of the Page - 430 -
430
requirements of landscape plans, but can deviate from them if appropriate reasons
are given in the planning process. Thus, there is a strong link between landscape and
spatial planning (at the regional and federal state level) and land use planning (at the
local level), even if landscape planning remains independent. Furthermore, all spa-
tial and land use plans (and in some federal states, also landscape plans), are usually
subject to a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) according to the EU
SEAÂ Directive, by which potential impacts of plans on the environment and on
human health are assessed. In the following text we concentrate on landscape plans
at municipal level (aka âThe local landscape planâ), as this is a sufficiently concrete
level (scale usually 1:10.000), appropriate for considering health issues related to
distinct areas; although health topics could also be an issue at other levels in the
planning system.
19.3.2 The (Landscape) Planning System in the UK
In the UK, planning is devolved to the four countries of England, Wales, Scotland
and Northern Ireland, whose enabling legislation and guidance tools are largely
country-specific (Winter et al. 2016). The English planning system, on which we
put a certain focus here, differs strongly from the German one; with the âLocalism
Actâ of 2011 the regional planning tier was abolished and almost all planning
responsibility was conferred to the local level. The only guidance for local planning
is given by the âNational Planning Policy Frameworkâ (NPPF, Department for
Communities and Local Government 2012), which has to be âtaken into account in
the preparation of local and neighbourhood plans, and is a material consideration in
planning decisionsâ (ibid., p. 1), the legislative basis of which are the âPlanning &
Compulsory Purchase Actâ (2004) and the âTown and Country Planning Regulationsâ
(2012). Local Plans have taken over the function of the former âLocal Development
Frameworks,â which were a portfolio of different planning documents, with a âCore
Strategyâ as their central element. Both kinds of local planning documents still co-
exist and have to consider environmental and landscape issues, according to sec-
tions 9 (âProtecting Green Belt landâ) and 11 (âConserving and Enhancing the
Natural Environmentâ) of the NPPF. Under the Town and Country Planning
(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, local planning authorities
have a general responsibility to consider the environmental implications of develop-
ments that are subject to planning control. The 2017 Regulations integrate
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures into this framework but apply
only to those projects that are likely to have significant effects on the environment,
e.g. airports, major road developments; power generation installations; mining, etc.
Despite environmental issues only playing a subordinate role in the formal UK
planning systems, no separate or independent landscape planning system exists. One
could argue that this obvious neglect of environmental and landscape issues in UK
land-use planning has led to attempts to fill that gap, for example, by a considerable
amount of local and (sub-)regional level, informal planning instruments such as
S. Heiland et al.
Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change
- Title
- Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change
- Authors
- Melissa Marselle
- Jutta Stadler
- Horst Korn
- Katherine Irvine
- Aletta Bonn
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-02318-8
- Size
- 15.5 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 508
- Keywords
- Environment, Environmental health, Applied ecology, Climate change, Biodiversity, Public health, Regional planning, Urban planning
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima