Page - 80 - in Cancer Nanotheranostics - What Have We Learnd So Far?
Image of the Page - 80 -
Text of the Page - 80 -
Conniotet al. Nanocarriers for immunecell targetingand tracking
are10–50-foldhigherthaninnormaltissues, leadingtoimproved
therapeuticefficacyandless sideeffects (Iyeretal.,2006;Danhier
etal., 2010).
Active targeting
Nanotechnology-basedstrategieshavebeenexploredasplatforms
for drug delivery, cancer vaccination and/or diagnosis, due to
theircapacity forovercomingbiologicalbarriersandtomodulate
payloads’ intracellular trafficking.Thesenanoparticulate systems
present a good potential for site-selective delivery by binding
recognitionligandstoNPsurface,whichcanenhanceNPendocy-
tosis, influencing their intracellular traffickingandthus inducing
prolongedeffects (Danhieretal., 2010).
Surface functionalization of nano-based systems (Figure4)
hasbeenusedtoimprovetissueandcell surfaceantigentargeting,
thus moderating non-specific distribution and prolonging the
bloodcirculationtimeofnano-basedsystems(Alexisetal.,2008).
PEGylation is a widespread strategy to improve the half-life
time of nanocarriers, through steric stabilization and “stealth”
properties. It relies on the introduction of poly(ethylene glycol)
(PEG) molecules by conjugation, grafting or adsorption onto
the surface of nanosystems (Figure5). The terminal groups of
PEG chains also present very suitable moieties to attach func-
tional ligands and attain active-targeted carriers (Freichels et al.,
2012). The conjugation of antibody fragments to PEG ends,
using disulfide bonds, may consist in an interesting strategy to
develop platforms for active targeting (Brocchini et al., 2008). D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS) has been
reportedasanalternative toPEG(PanandFeng,2008).
Active-targeted nanosystems are based on the design of
nanocarriers with bioactive ligands placed onto their surface
or periphery. They will be recognized by overexpressedmolec-
ular patterns at the tissues/cells intended to target, facilitating
NP recognition and subsequent receptor-mediated endocytosis
(Figure6) (Chenget al., 2007;Kumaret al., 2009;Danhier et al.,
2010; Aslan et al., 2013;Nicolas et al., 2013;Wang et al., 2013a;
Gaoetal., 2014).Surfacemodifications representanoutstanding
tool for cell targeting allowing a specific contact of nanopartic-
ulate systemswithcritical immunecells, as evidenced inStephan
etal. (2010).Forexample, theligandDEC-205ishighlyexpressed
by CD8+DCs, cells particularly efficient at “cross-presenting”
exogenous antigens on MHCI, constituting a highly relevant
pathway for the development of a cytolytic immune response.
Moreover, recent studies have indicated that the triggering of
CD40onAPCscanleadtoCD8T-cell effectors,without theneed
ofcommonstimulationbyMHCII-relatedThcells viaCD40 lig-
ands (Vonderheide et al., 2013).Mannose receptors at DCs are
also associated to ligand internalization and further processing
and presentation by immune cells, leading to amore extensive
immune response (Lu et al., 2007; Carrillo-Conde et al., 2011;
Silvaetal., 2013).
These ligands, suchaspeptides, antibodiesandantibody frag-
ments, carbohydrates and evenvitamins,maybe either attached
before the nanocarrier production or afterwards. Liking ligands
FIGURE4 |Examples of NP functionalization. NPs can be
functionalized differently in order to attain distinct goals. PEG or TGPS
functionalization provide stealth properties to NPs, avoiding capture by
phagocytic cells and increasing their circulation time. Functionalization
of NPs with imaging agents, such as fluorescent probes, radionuclides
or contrast agents (e.g., gold or magnetic NPs), provide applicability
of NPs to diagnostic, theranostic or even in vivo real-time imaging.
The immunogenicity of NPs can be increased for immunotherapy or prophylactic vaccination. Different molecules can be used for that
propose, such as PAMPs (several carbohydrates, lipids or nucleic
acids) or immunogenic polymers (e.g., chitosan, alginate, poloxamers).
Specific tissue and cell targeting can be achieved through the
functionalization of NPs with antibodies directed to specific or
overexpressed antigens. Cell-penetrating peptides can improve NP
internalization. pH-sensitive coatings allow drug release in specific
tissues or intracellular compartments in a pH-dependent manner.
www.frontiersin.org November2014 |Volume2 |Article105 | 80
Cancer Nanotheranostics
What Have We Learnd So Far?
- Title
- Cancer Nanotheranostics
- Subtitle
- What Have We Learnd So Far?
- Authors
- JoĂŁo Conde
- Pedro Viana Baptista
- JesĂşs M. De La Fuente
- Furong Tian
- Editor
- Frontiers in Chemistry
- Date
- 2016
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-2-88919-776-7
- Size
- 21.0 x 27.7 cm
- Pages
- 132
- Keywords
- Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles, nanomaterials, Cancer, heranostics, Immunotherapy, bioimaging, Drug delivery, Gene Therapy, Phototherapy
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Chemie