Page - 110 - in Cancer Nanotheranostics - What Have We Learnd So Far?
Image of the Page - 110 -
Text of the Page - 110 -
Alcantaraet al. Molecular imagingofbreast cancer
treatmentthanthedecreaseoftumorsize.Furthermore, thecom-
bination of spectroscopy and diffusionMRI data have demon-
strated a high specificity to characterize benign andmalignant
lesions(Tsougosetal., 2014).
CONTRASTAGENTS
In spite of the multiple image diagnostic tools commented on
above, radiologists still find some difficulties when diagnosing
earlystagebreasttumormalignanciesduetothelackofsensibility
given for these techniques.Earlydetectionhasbecomeoneof the
most important issues in the cancer treatment, and researchers
have improvedthis issuebydevelopingexternal substancescalled
contrastagentsthatenhancethesensibilityofimagesintheregion
of interest. This fact allows improvement to the quality and the
follow-up of molecular processes at the cellular andmolecular
levels of the region under study. The more common contrast
agents used in clinical studies are gadolinium- and iodine-based
structures formagnetic resonance imaging andmammography
(X-ray)respectively,howeverothercontrastagents suchasradio-
tracers are being investigated as potential biomarkers for daily
clinicalpractice.
MAGNETICRESONANCEIMAGINGCONTRASTAGENTS
As noted above, the gadolinium-based contrast agents are the
most commonly used in clinical practice, generating a positive
image of the nearby tissues. The presence of gadolinium ions
shortens the T1 relaxation time, thus generating an increase of
the intensity in the images (bright signal or positive image) that
help to distinguishmalignancies fromother benign pathologies
(ZhouandLu, 2013).However, gadolinium is ahigh toxicpara-
magneticcation(Gd3+)thatneedstobeprotectedfromthebody,
so gadolinium ismainly reactedwith chelate ligands thusmin-
imizing the toxicity effects from the free gadolinium (Gd3+).
Therefore, themost typically used gadolinium chelates asMRI
contrast agents in clinical practice are gadopentetate dimeglu-
mine (Gd-DTPA, Magnevist®), gadoterate dimeglumine (Gd-
DOTA, Dotarem®), gadoteridol (Gd(HP-DO3A), Prohance®),
and gadodiamine (Gd(DTPA-BMA), Omniscan®). These con-
trast agents, approved by the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), present excellent biodistributionwithin the extracellular
space, and fast renal clearance from the body with half-lives of
1–2h.Albeit themostusedgadolinium-basedcontrastagentsare
theGd-chelates, complexgadolinium-basedcontrast agentshave
been developed to improve their T1 relaxation time and phar-
macokinetics. These complexes providewell-defined advantages
overGd-chelates due to slow rotationalmotion, they are a com-
bination ofGd-chelates, such asGd-DTPA andGd-DOTA, and
dendrimers (Li et al., 2013) or liposomes (Huang andTsourkas,
2013; Zhou and Lu, 2013). For instance, poly(amidoamine)
PAMAMdendrimers indifferent generationshave shownhigher
r1 relaxivity and size-dependent pharmacokinetics, low genera-
tion(2–4)presented renal clearance, andhighgeneration (5–10)
presentedminimal renal clearance. A recentmodification in the
designof contrast agentdendrimers resulted in thedevelopment
of dendrimer nanoclusters (DNCs), as a combination of small
PAMAMdendrimers.TheseDNCswereeasilysynthesizedinhigh
yields andalso exhibitedhigher r1 values than the small units of PAMAM-based contrast agents (Cheng et al., 2010). TheseGd-
chelateswerealsocombinedwith liposomesvia encapsulation in
the inner core or immobilization at the liposome surface, being
the immobilizationmost used since the relaxivity is higher than
intheencapsulatedmethod,thusexhibitingalowwaterexchange
rate with the gadolinium encapsulated in the inner core of the
liposome.
X-RAYCONTRASTAGENTS
Iodine-basedcontrast agents improve thevisualizationof images
in radiography andCT by increasing the density of tissues and
also the vessels. Similarly to dynamic MRI using Gd chelates,
relevant information can be extracted from the different uptake
kinetics of these contrast agents that helps in differentiating
malignant lesions frombenign tissues. In case ofmalignant tis-
sues,theiodineisrapidlyabsorbedanddesorbed(morecontrast),
while in the benign ones the absorption takes place slowly (less
contrast), thus giving differences in the tissue density of the
images. Iodine contrast agents could be sorted into two groups
depending on the binding to the iodine: covalent (non-ionic)
or ionic contrast agents (Robbins andPozniak, 2010). The ionic
contrast agents present are better contrast agents than the non-
ionic ones due to their higher osmolality,with the consequently
increaseddeliveryordisassociationofiodine(Barrettetal.,1992).
However, the ionic iodine contrast agents inducesmore toxicity
(moresideeffects)mainlydue to the largeamountof iodine ions
delivered(higherosmolality injected incomparisonwithserum),
beingalsorecentlyreportedthatthesecontrastagentscouldaffect
the thyroid in some patients (Rhee et al., 2012). Therefore, in
order tominimize the toxicity, the contrast agents used for the
clinical practice present values close to the serum, and non-
ionicbondssuchasIohexol300mgIodine/mL(Omnipaque)and
Iodixanol320mgIodine/mL(Visipaque).
POSITRONEMISSIONMAMMOGRAPHY(PEM)
PEM is high-resolution PET scanner that provides functional
imaging specifically for breast cancer detection (Kalles et al.,
2013). PEM can isolate and enhance breast images with more
accuracy than full-body PET scans andworksmuch like a full-
body PET scan (see Section PET and SPECT). In this tech-
nique, thecontrast agentsused in theevaluationofbreast cancer
are radiotracers (Penuelas et al., 2012), in particular radioac-
tive labeled sugar-like molecules. These radiotracers help the
diagnostic accuracy of the cancer, especially in the early stages,
metastasis,andalsocancerprogressionduringthetreatment.18F-
fluorodeoxiglucose (FDG) (Caldarella et al., 2014) is the most
typical radiotracer used as a contrast agent in PEM. FDG is an
analog of glucose that is accumulated, after injection,mostly in
cancer tissues, since those present a faster metabolism in com-
parisonwith the normal tissues allowing amore clear vision of
the suspectedmalignant tissues by PEM.Another radiotracer is
the3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine(18FLT).Thisradiotracer is
not still used as a routinebreast cancer contrast agent in clinical
practice, but it hasbeen tested as abiomarker for imaging cellu-
lar proliferation. 18FLT is a structural analogofDNAnucleoside
thymidine that is trapped in the cell thus informing about the
stage ormonitoring the evolution of the tumor cells (Caldarella
Frontiers inChemistry | ChemicalEngineering December2014 |Volume2 |Article112 | 110
Cancer Nanotheranostics
What Have We Learnd So Far?
- Title
- Cancer Nanotheranostics
- Subtitle
- What Have We Learnd So Far?
- Authors
- João Conde
- Pedro Viana Baptista
- Jesús M. De La Fuente
- Furong Tian
- Editor
- Frontiers in Chemistry
- Date
- 2016
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-2-88919-776-7
- Size
- 21.0 x 27.7 cm
- Pages
- 132
- Keywords
- Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles, nanomaterials, Cancer, heranostics, Immunotherapy, bioimaging, Drug delivery, Gene Therapy, Phototherapy
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Chemie