Page - (000088) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development

staffwithin a respective regional or thematic focus. Theworkshops/writeshops can bring together selected projects in a region as a team that will continue to work together over a period of time. It is key that the agenda is designed to hone the individual project IPs towards a coherent and cohesive regional and global R4D program that complements other ongoing initiatives and contributes to the given development goals. While it took a considerable amount of effort, the iterative development of the CCAFSTOCsandimpactpathwayswasdone inaresource-efficientway. It started offmostly virtually and intensely facilitated, buildingonCCAFSPhase 1 engage- ment and regional priorities, and was completed in five regional face-to face meetings with key next-users and stakeholders within the CGIAR research com- munity (Schuetz et al. 2014e, f). Building on the learning-based approach to developing a suitable TOC approach for CCAFS, a series of learning notes was written todocument theRBMtrial experiences and the rollingout of the approach to the whole program (CCAFS 2015a). The TOC development and facilitation process, and guidance documentation were revised to make them leaner, more contextualized and easier to implement (Schuetz et al. 2014d). TheTOCbuilding process is one key component in theCCAFSMEL system that was developed to support the newapproach in a comprehensivemanner (CCAFS2015b). Flagship 4 Outcome 2025 Policies and ins tu ons at different scales enable equitable food systems that are resilient to a variable and changing climate WA’s FP4 2019 Outcome Statement Na onal decision makers start inves ng in policies and institutions that take into consideration CSA practices and strategies FP4 2019 Outcome #2 Appropriately directed institutional investment of Regional/ global organisa ons (e.g. IFAD, WB,FAO, UNFCCC)based on national/regional engagementto learn about local climatesmart food systempriorities FP4 2019 Outcome #1 Na onal/sub-na onal jurisdic ons enact equitable food system policies and increase institutional investment that take into consideration climate smart practices/strategies, better articulated among themselves and in collabora on with privatesector, civil society and researchers informed by CCAFS decision support tools EA’s FP4 2019 Outcome Statement Na onal ministries of agriculture, environment, and parliamentarians are collabora ng to make evidence informed policies for increased investments in climate resilient food systems LAM’s FP4 2019 Outcome Statement Na onal jurisdic ons design and enact food system policies and strategies to support national policy and global climate change negotiations and together with private institutions develop NAPs with their respective investment plans using CCAFS data and tools SA’s FP4 2019 Outcome Statement Na onal/subna onal jurisdic ons develop CSA policies and programs, and strengthen related institutions based on evidence provided by CCAFS science SEA’s FP4 2019 Outcome Statement Policy makers enhancing the design, investment decisions, implementation and M&E of food system and climate change policies through a transparent, coordinative and consultative mode from local to national level EA’s FP4 2019 Outcome Statement African Group of Nego ators, UNFCCC Focal Pointsare using scientific evidence to effec vely ar culate the African position on agriculture and climate change issues, reflecting also in current and emerging global agreements INDICATOR: # of national/subnational jurisdictions that increased their equitable institutional investments in climate smart food systems TARGET 2025 FP4: 20 EA contribu on:?EA contribu on:2 SEA contribu on:4 + 4WA contribu on: 2 + 1 LAM contribu on:3 + 2SA contribu on:3 INDICATOR 1: # of equitable national/subnational food system policies enacted that take into consideration climate smart practices and strategies; Target:15 (WA: 2, EA: 2, LAM: 3, SA: 3, SEA: 4, Global: 0) INDICATOR:# of regional/global organisationsthat inform their equitable institutional investments in climate smart food systems using CCAFS outputs; Target:10 (WA: 1, EA: ?, LAM: 2, SA: 0, SEA: 4, Global: 3) Fig. 4.4 Illustration of aCCAFS thematic IP component (Drawn from theFlagshipProgramon Policies and Institutions forClimateResilient FoodSystems) 4 Pathway to Impact: Supporting andEvaluatingEnablingEnvironments for. . . 69