Page - (000287) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development

The technical team assessed CRMprocesses through the use of Brooks score card.9 The score cardmeasuresCRM indicators inTrack 1 through 8 parameters, namely, climate change mainstreaming/integration into planning, institutional coordination, budgeting and finance, institutional knowledge/capacity, use of cli- mate information, planningunderuncertainty, participation, andawareness among stakeholders. Under each parameter, there are five questions that need to be answeredbefore scoresareassigned.The typeof scoring ischosenbystakeholders in termsofweighting(0–4)orpercentages. InIsioloCounty,percentageswereused to depict the extent towhich progress against the indicator was beingmade. The score card and its results are shown inTable 15.1. 15.2.2 Bottom-Up (Track2)Process Before communities were facilitated to develop ToCs per ward, it was important that communities defined the term resilience in their own context so as to under- stand how their planned adaptation actions contributed to resilience. The researchers workedwith sixWAPCs to identify 20ward adaptation/development interventionscoveringthewater, livestock,andnatural resourcegovernancesectors thatwere in planningphases.Eachof thesewardswas then assisted in developing theirownspecificToC, identifyingoutputs,outcomes, long termimpact, indicators and assumptions. Fig. 15.1 TAMD framework (Adapted from Brooks & Fisher (2014) (Brooks, N., & Fisher, S. (2014). Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development (TAMD): A step-by-step guide [Toolkit]. London,UK: International Institute forEnvironmentalDevelopment (IIED).Retrieved fromhttp://pubs.iied.org/10100IIED) 9SeeBrooks et al., 2013, p. 30–34. 274 I.Karani andN.Kariuki