Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Naturwissenschaften
Umwelt und Klima
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Page - (000333) -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - (000333) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development

Image of the Page - (000333) -

Image of the Page - (000333) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development

Text of the Page - (000333) -

indicator or monitoring product. Although this resistance has faded with time, it persists among some stakeholders. InstitutionalFragilities wererevealedalongtheprocess, rangingfromthelackof personnel,high turnoverorexperienceofpartners’ staffs, and the lackofplanning- based management (which includes the lack of integration and knowledge of monitoring andother data). The perception of these institutional fragilities as challenging iswell documented in the notes of the third technical workshop (Salvador, INEMA (BA), November 19–20),andmorespecifically in thediscussionsabout themonitoringnetworkgaps and bottle necks that were identified through an institutional and IT analyses performed to support theDMprocess. 17.6.3 Strengths in theDroughtNLTAProcess CommitmentandParticipation hasbeenoneof thekeys toovercometheabove- mentioned resistance, resulting froma sumof factors: • A regionally-led initiative (as opposed to one that is purely top-down); • A technical-scientific process that is less susceptible to political interference; • The immediate applicability of the concepts and studies to theongoingdrought in the region; • Thedifferentiation of theDMfromothermonitoring products, and; • Thehighlyparticipatorymethodology that acknowledged the importanceof the contributionsfromtechniciansaswellasof theupper-levelmanagersandpolicy makers. CapacityDevelopment and Institutional Strengthening resulted from the par- ticipation in theDPPsand theDM.Respondents agreed that therewasanunequiv- ocal gain in knowledge and improved capacity to deliver daily duties, with a broader andmore complex vision than they had previously possessed before the initiationof the process, as the quote below illustrates: “Whatcan onesay,what toargue, toamayor,agovernor? (. . .)NowIcansaywe know the limitations of the dam. (. . .) Today I am sure I am adopting the correct measures. (. . .) “Wefeel secure to tell thepressweareprepared (. . .)”. –Manager of awater resources company inPernambuco state, participant of aDPP. Interview andworkshopnotes The institutional strengthening isdirectly linkedwith thecapacitydevelopment. The interviewees reported that their institutions are stronger andmore capable to deliver their services.This strengtheningalsoderives fromthemethodologiesused 17 Drought PreparednessPolicies andClimateChangeAdaptation andResilience. . . 321
back to the  book Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development"
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Title
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Authors
Juha I. Uitto
Jyotsna Puri
Rob D. van den Berg
Publisher
Springer Open
Date
2017
Language
German
License
CC BY-NC 3.0
ISBN
978-3-319-43702-6
Size
15.5 x 24.1 cm
Pages
365
Keywords
Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
Categories
Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development