Page - (000335) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Image of the Page - (000335) -
Text of the Page - (000335) -
Before,we only monitored our state, now we are looking at the Northeast as a
wholeandbeyond. (. . .)Weexpandednotonly theknowledge,butourvisionofwhat
happens,becausenaturehasnobarriers,no limits.Technician at a climate institu-
tion,Ceara´ state, participant of theDM, interview
17.6.4 Limits andPossibilities of theWBIApproach
Implementation in theDroughtNLTA:Lessons toBe
Remembered
The implementationof theWBIpilot approach in theDroughtNLTAprogramhas
raisedsomeimportantpointsofdiscussion, in termsofmethodologicalconclusions
and contributions.
• Although relevant outcomes can happen in early implementation stages, pro-
grams framedasmulti-stakeholder/multi-sectorpartnerships andstronglybased
on voluntary collaboration, such as the Drought NTLA, tend to take time to
develop. The harvesting of significant outcomeswill likely benefit frommore
implementation time.Whenthefirstharvestingwasdone(i.e.,November2014–
January 2015), the program was in mid-term implementation phase. Results
influencedby theprogramwere starting todevelopbutwerenotyet ready tobe
reported as outcomes.
• The risk of having partners over-reporting positive outcomes to which the
program has not truly contributed (e.g., to please the donor) can be overcome
with rigorousmethods.Triangulationof sources (combiningdocument reviews,
interviews, andother sources of information) andprobing are extremely neces-
sary.Theframeworkprovokes theanalyst todo just that, byasking forevidence
of the reportedoutcomes.
• Outcomes need to be interpreted taking the context into account (political
environment, staff turnover, local andorganizationalculture,necessarysupport,
etc.). Fostering partnerships needs respect for the various partners’ capacities
and their specific contexts. This principle allows the collaboration to generate
outcomesthatsometimesmaybemorerealisticandmorelikelytobesustainable
in the longer termthan theplanned,non-achievedoutcomes. It is thecaseof the
Piquet Carneiro DPP.While this plan did not define policy andmanagement
actions triggered as the drought progresses to higher stages, the planwas built
throughabroadconsultationprocess, includingdiscussionsandthedevelopment
of theplanproposaland intermediatevalidationswithdifferent stakeholders.As
a result, it includescoherent andconsistentmanagement activities related to the
preparationandriskreduction,andtouchesonresponseanddisasterrecoveryfor
extremedrought effects in themunicipality. It also provides a series of recom-
mendations for institutional strengthening, adoption of management tools,
17 Drought PreparednessPolicies andClimateChangeAdaptation andResilience. . . 323
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Title
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Authors
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2017
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Size
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 365
- Keywords
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima