Page - (000345) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Image of the Page - (000345) -
Text of the Page - (000345) -
In addition to thefive criteria, theAdaptationM&ENavigator provides further
details for everyM&Eapproach according to a template illustrated inTables 18.3
and 18.4. The template provides information on the required human andfinancial
resources to implement anM&Eapproach aswell as on benefits and limitations.
Table 18.1 (continued)
Criterion Description Relevance
Complexity of
implementation The relative complexity of anM&E
approach compared toothers. Low
complexity indicates that anM&E
approachisrelativelystraightforward
to understand. For example, asking
beneficiaries about their perceptions
is an intuitively understoodM&E
procedurewhereas the details of
assessing avoided economic costs are
more complex Thedegreeof complexityprovides a
rough indication of the ease of
applying anM&Eapproach andof
the resourcesneeded(know-howand
financial resources)
Lowcomplexity does notmean that
approaches canbe easily
implemented.Qualitative assess-
ments also require relevant expertise
tobecarriedout inarigorousmanner
Subjectivity of
resulting
information The relative subjectivity of the
resultingM&Efindings, i.e. the
extent towhichtheycanbeinfluenced
by those involved in theM&Epro-
cess. For example,M&Eapproaches
basedon surveyingbeneficiarieswill
bemore subjective than impact eval-
uations basedonquasi experimental
designs It is important to reflect how the
M&Eprocess can influence the
M&Efindings andhow this reso-
nateswith thepurpose and intended
useof theM&Eresults
Subjectivity does notmean less
valuable information. In fact, the
viewsof beneficiaries or key infor-
mantsmaybe exactly the typeof
informationneeded.Moreover,
quantitative approaches cannot be
equatedwith objectivity.Whilst
indicator valuesmaybeobjective,
the choice ofwhich indictors are
included andhow they are defined
maynot be entirely objective
Application
experience to
date Available experience to date in
applying aparticularM&Eapproach
to climate change adaptation. Some
approaches like theoryof changeor
those used for impact evaluations
havebeenwidelyused inotherfields,
but this criterion focuses on the
availableexperienceinapplyingthem
specifically to adaptation to climate
change Available experience influences the
cost anduncertainty of applying a
particularM&Eapproach
18 TheAdaptationM&ENavigator:ADecisionSupportTool for the. . . 333
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Title
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Authors
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2017
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Size
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 365
- Keywords
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima