Page - (000351) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development

18.7 Conclusion The Adaptation M&E Navigator is closing a gap in the existing landscape of guidebooks and tools for adaptation M&E. First, it provides a list of specific purposes for undertaking adaptationM&E in practice. In doing so it goes beyond thefrequentlystatedgeneralpurposes likeaccountabilityandlearningwhich, taken on their own, are not sufficient to decide upon particularM&E approaches. Sec- ondly, theAdaptationM&ENavigator illustrates to decisionmakers the range of available options and equips themwith the necessary information to select among those the most suitable one for their particular purpose. The Adaptation M&E Navigator is hosted on an established online platform (www. AdaptationCommunity.net) in theformofaneasy tousewebinterface.Bydrawing upon adaptationM&Eapproaches and examples available to date, theAdaptation M&ENavigatoralsodemonstrates theprogresswhichhasbeenmadeinthissubject area since the first International Conference on Evaluating Climate Change and Development tookplace in 2009. References Adler,R.,Wilson,K.,Abbot,P.,&Blackshaw,U. (2015).Approachtomonitoringandevaluation of institutional capacity for adaptation to climate change: The case of theUnitedKingdom’s investment to Ethiopia’s climate-resilient green economy. In D. Bours, C. McGinn, & P. Pringle (Eds.),Monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation: A review of the landscape.NewDirections forEvaluation, 147, 61–74. Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2014a).Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation and resilience: A synthesis of tools, frameworks and approaches (2nd ed.). Phnom Penh: SEA Change Community of Practice, and Oxford UKCIP. Retrieved from: http://www.seachangecop.org/node/3258 Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2014b).Guidance note 1: Twelve reasons why climate changeadaptationM&Eis challenging. PhnomPenh:SEAChangeCoP, andOxford,United Kingdom: UKCIP. Retrieved from http://www.ukcip.org.uk/wp-content/PDFs/MandE-Guid ance-Note1.pdf. Brooks, N., Anderson, S., Ayers, J., Burton, I., & Tellam, I. (2011). Tracking adaptation and measuring development (TAMD) (Climate ChangeWorking Paper No. 1). London: Interna- tional Institute for Environmental Development (IIED). Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/ pdfs/10031IIED.pdf Brooks, N., Fisher, S., Rai, N., Anderson, S., Karani, I., Levine, T., & Steinbach, D. (2014). Trackingadaptationandmeasuringdevelopment.A step-by-stepguide.London: International Institute for Environmental Development (IIED). Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/ 10100IIED.html CARE. (2012).Participatorymonitoring, evaluation, reflectionand learning for community-based adaptation: Amanual for local practitioners. CARE International and IIED. Retrieved from: http://www.care.org/sites/default/files/documents/CC-2012-CARE_PMERL_Manual_2012.pdf Chen, S., &Uitto, J. I. (2014). Small grants, big impacts. Aggregation challenges. In J. I. Uitto (Ed.), Evaluating environment in international development (pp. 105–122). New York: Routledge. EuropeanEnvironmentAgency (EEA). (2015).Nationalmonitoring, reportingandevaluationof climate changeadaptation inEurope. Copenhagen:EuropeanEnvironmentAgency (EEA). 18 TheAdaptationM&ENavigator:ADecisionSupportTool for the. . . 339