Page - (000047) - in Disrupted Development and the Future of Inequality in the Age of Automation
Image of the Page - (000047) -
Text of the Page - (000047) -
4 TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION 39
which today’s HICs used to have (Frey, Osborne, & Holmes, 2016).
Beyond the perceived threat of “technological unemployment,” there
are broader questions to be asked about how automation and digitiza-
tion influence economic development, employment growth, and struc-
tural transformation in developing countries. It may well be that labor
displacement is less of an issue than real-wage growth as a result of the
potential for automation, for example.
4.2 AutomAtion: definitions And determinAnts
The concept of automation is more difficult to define than might seem
at first glance. Throughout history, humans have used tools to save time
and effort when completing laborious tasks and thanks to innovation,
such tools have gradually increased in sophistication. Today, the spec-
trum of “physical capital” ranges from simple manual tools to intelli-
gent machines. One could thus argue that a “robot” is simply a highly
advanced version of a tool which requires minimal (manual) human
input for completing a task, although currently all machines still require
considerable human intervention in their design, production, installa-
tion, and maintenance. The potential of AI is to move machines beyond
human oversight, at least in everyday operation. An intelligent machine
performs a set of complex tasks autonomously and may be capable of
adapting to new and changing circumstances, i.e. “learning.” Workhorse
animals could be considered a biological equivalent of complex machines
and have been used in transportation and agriculture since at least the
agricultural revolution in 10,000 BC. Contemporary automation often
tends to be associated with physical hardware such as industrial robots,
but also includes software which plays a critical role in service automa-
tion (see Lacity & Willcocks, 2018; Willcocks & Lacity, 2016). The
wider process of structural economic change toward an automated econ-
omy has been referred to not only as a digital transformation but as the
“fourth industrial revolution” (Schwab, 2016).
Under what conditions might such a transformation or revolution
take place? Technological feasibility is just one condition. Table 4.1 shows
multiple criteria which the decision to automate involves: can a task be
automated in a way that reliably produces a good or service at a spec-
ified level of quality? Is it profitable to automate that task? Is it legally
possible for a firm to replace workers with machines? How do relevant
stakeholders such as political groupings, particularly trade unions, and
Disrupted Development and the Future of Inequality in the Age of Automation