Page - 190 - in Freshwater Microplastics - Emerging Environmental Contaminants?
Image of the Page - 190 -
Text of the Page - 190 -
furunculosis in hatcheries, on several plastic types [62]. Recently, 16S rRNA
gene sequences affiliated to Tenacibaculum spp. (another genus including fish
pathogens) were detected on PET in seawater [42]. Research has only started to
shed light on this issue, aswell as the ability of polymers to transport biologically
produced toxins.
2.3.2 BiodegradationandPollutantTransport
Several reviews of research into plastic biodegradation have been published (e.g.,
see [11β13, 24,63β65]).Therefore, onlyabrief overviewof this topic is provided.
Plastic biodegradation involves several steps during which the polymer is enzy-
matically cleaved into oligomers andmonomers that can be assimilated bymicro-
organisms [65]. Many microbial taxa can degrade biopolymers2 including
polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polyhydroxybutyrate-polyhydroxyvalerate
(PHBV). The biodegradation rates of biopolymers in freshwater have been found
to exceed those inmarine environments, andhigher rates have also beenobserved
insewage thanwithinnatural freshwaters [63,66,67].Evenso, thesematerialscan
still persist for considerable periods of time in freshwaters, with a lifespan of
~10 years having been estimated for PHBVbottles deposited onto lake sediments
at a depthof 85m[68].
In comparisonwith biopolymers, traditional plastics (such asPE,PET, andPP)
will persist for even longer within aquatic environments (decades or centuries;
[11, 63, 64]), with biodegradation typically preceded by abiotic weathering
[24, 65]. Although it has been unclear whether plastispheremembers can biode-
grade conventional plastics [11, 69, 70], a bacterial strain isolated from sediment
near a Japanese bottle recycling facility (Ideonella sakaiensis)was recently found
to assimilate PET [18]. The strainwas shown to employ two enzymes to degrade
PET at a daily rate of 0.13mg cm 2 when incubated at 30 C [18]. This finding
implies that other synthetic plastic-degrading taxa are likely to be present within
aquatic environments. Indeed, colonization of plastics by potentially
hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria has been observed in both marine and freshwater
habitats [21, 45, 47β49]. However, due to a lack of research into plastisphere
physiology, the long residence times of plasticwaste, and the ability of polymers
to adsorbpolyaromatichydrocarbons [11, 12], themechanismsunderlying recruit-
mentofhydrocarbondegradersonmicroplasticsareunknown.Theseandother taxa
could mediate desorption and/or degradation of several plastic-associated com-
pounds, including additives and diverse pollutants, with implications for the eco-
logical impacts of microplastics. Indeed, Bryant et al. [49] already reported the
presenceofdiversexenobioticdegradationgenes inassociationwithmarineplastic
debris. Since organic contaminants and metals rapidly partition into biofilms
2Polymers derived from renewable biomass (as opposed tononrenewable fossil fuels).
190 J.P.Harrison et al.
Freshwater Microplastics
Emerging Environmental Contaminants?
- Title
- Freshwater Microplastics
- Subtitle
- Emerging Environmental Contaminants?
- Authors
- Martin Wagner
- Scott Lambert
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2018
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-61615-5
- Size
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 316
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Chemie