Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Naturwissenschaften
Physik
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations
Page - 80 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 80 - in Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations

Image of the Page - 80 -

Image of the Page - 80 - in Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations

Text of the Page - 80 -

Use can however be made of the iterative nature of the dynamic orbit integration. An alternative quality check can be derived from the position corrections applied at each iteration l to give the new positions at iteration l+1. These are the∆re from eq. (5.2.26). Given a perfect dynamic orbit integration process consisting of a correct orbit integration implementation and error-free data, it is expected that the∆re must grow smaller with each iteration. The integrated dynamic orbit approaches the true satellite orbit, and the difference between subsequent iterations of orbits must thus vanish: lim l→∞ ∆re=0 . (7.1.1) For all practical considerations, constraints such as flawed algorithms or the limited precision of computations set a lower bound for the achievable repeatability of the orbit integration. This precludes the differences in eq. (7.1.1) from disappearing entirely. Instead, even as more iterations of computation are performed, the differences∆re stop to grow smaller after some computational threshold is reached. This convergence limit can be used as a benchmark to test the quality of orbit determination strategies both amongst different implementation and on their own merit, always given the same input data. The better the algorithm is designed and implemented, the smaller the ultimate limit of the position differences becomes. Figure 7.1 shows the convergence in terms of∆re for 100 iterations of computation, based on simulated data. The exact specifications of the simulation are given later in section 7.3. At this point the magnitude of the remaining variability between iterations is of primary interest. It can be clearly seen that even after convergence,∆re does not drop much below 10µm. As the expected ranging accuracy of the GRACE-FO LRI is expected to be smaller than 100nm (Heinzel et al., 2012), it is worth investigating avenues to improve on this result. 1 10 100 Iteration l 10−5 10−3 10−1 101 Figure 7.1: Unsatisfying convergence of dynamic orbit integration after several iterations l, expressed as the RMS of ‖∆re‖. From simulated data. Chapter7 Numerical Optimization in Orbit Integration80
back to the  book Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations"
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations
Title
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery
Subtitle
Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations
Author
Matthias Ellmerr
Publisher
Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz
Location
Graz
Date
2018
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-85125-646-8
Size
21.0 x 29.7 cm
Pages
185
Keywords
Geodäsie, Gravitation, Geodesy, Physics, Physik
Categories
Naturwissenschaften Physik
Technik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery