Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Naturwissenschaften
Physik
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations
Page - 94 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 94 - in Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations

Image of the Page - 94 -

Image of the Page - 94 - in Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations

Text of the Page - 94 -

7.3.5 Propagation to Ranging Measurement The final integrated dynamic GRACE orbits are used at many steps in gravity field determination, as laid out in chapter 5. In eq. (6.4.58) a linearisation of the GRACE ll-SST KBR observations is computed from the dynamic orbits using eq. (4.3.9). Here, bothorbitsrA andrB forGRACE-AandGRACE-Bareused.Theimpactof thedynamic orbit noise on the term used to reduce the ranging measurement can be computed from eq. (4.3.2), ρCOM=‖u‖=‖rB−rA‖ . The norm of the position difference is ‖rB−rA‖= √ ∆x2+∆y2+∆z2 (7.3.1) regardless of the choice of reference frame. Let both rA and rB be given in the SRF of either satellite, for example arbitrarily GRACE-A. Then x is approximately the along-track, y the cross-track, and z the radial difference in position. From eq. (7.3.1), simple error propagation gives σ2ρCOM=2 [( ∆x ‖u‖ )2 σ2x+ ( ∆y ‖u‖ )2 σ2y+ ( ∆z ‖u‖ )2 σ2z ] . (7.3.2) With x being the along-track axis, the partials can be approximated with ∆x ‖u‖ ≈1 (7.3.3) and ∆y ‖u‖ ≈ ∆z ‖u‖ ≈0 . (7.3.4) This gives the standard deviation of the derived baseline as σρCOM= √ 2σx . (7.3.5) The uncertainty of the orbit in the along-track axis due to the integration algorithm is given by the PSDs displayed in fig. 7.6. After variance propagation with eq. (7.3.5), the PSDs can directly be differentiated in the frequency domain to compute the uncertainty of the reduction term in the range rate domain: σρ˙COM(f)=2pi f ·σρCOM(f) (7.3.6) The resulting PSDs are displayed in fig. 7.7. Here, the solid black line shows an error estimate for the GRACE KBR instrument. The dashed black line is an error estimate for the GRACE-FO laser ranging interferometer. All tested configurations lead to a Chapter7 Numerical Optimization in Orbit Integration94
back to the  book Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery - Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations"
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations
Title
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery
Subtitle
Improvements in Dynamic Orbit Integration, Stochastic Modelling of the Antenna Offset Correction, and Co-Estimation of Satellite Orientations
Author
Matthias Ellmerr
Publisher
Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz
Location
Graz
Date
2018
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-85125-646-8
Size
21.0 x 29.7 cm
Pages
185
Keywords
Geodäsie, Gravitation, Geodesy, Physics, Physik
Categories
Naturwissenschaften Physik
Technik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Contributions to GRACE Gravity Field Recovery