Page - 24 - in Intelligent Environments 2019 - Workshop Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Environments

by applying it towards development of a smart irrigation system. UC-IEDP in its current format has certain limitations. In particular, it focuses mostly on the technical aspect of project development. We also recommend UC-IEDP methodology to provide guidance to define suitable metrics and quality attributes for IEs. These should be identified and defined more explicitly. They should be monitored and measured during systems development for a more realistic evaluation of IEs. A proper configuration management strategy should also be put in place within the UC-IEDP methodology. Our current efforts are on improving UC-IEDP based on these initial findings and then applying it to another IE project. As future work, we plan to improve application of the proposed evaluation framework by developing a software tool. References [1] Unai Alegre, Juan Carlos Augusto, Tony Clark, Engineering context-aware systems and applications: A survey, Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 117, 2016, Pages 55-83, ISSN 0164-1212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.010. [2] J. Augusto, V. Callaghan, A. Kameas, D. Cook, I. Satoh, Intelligent Environments: a manifesto. Human - centric Computing and Information Sciences, 3:12, 2013. Springer. [3] J. Augusto, D. Kramer, U. Alegre, A. Covaci and A. Santokhee, Co-creation of Smart Technology with (and for) People with Special Needs, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, 2016, pp. 39- 46 [4] Bessam Abdulrazak & Yasir Malik (2012) Review of Challenges, Requirements, and Approaches of Pervasive Computing System Evaluation, IETE Technical Review, 29:6, 506-522, DOI: 10.4103/0256- 4602.105007 [5] B. Blanchard. Systems Engineering Management, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2004. [6] Boehm, B. (2006). Some future trends and implications for systems and software engineering processes. Systems Engineering, 9 (1): 1–19 [7] BKCASE Editorial Board. 2017. The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), v. 1.9.1 R.J. Cloutier (Editor in Chief). Hoboken, NJ: The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology. Accessed 10th March 2019. www.sebokwiki.org. [8] R. S. Bruff, “Systems Engineering Best Practices as Measured for Successful Outcomes in Selected United States Defense Industry Aerospace Programs,” Walden University, Dissertation 2008. [9] J. P. Elm, D. Goldenson, K. El Emam, N. Donatelli, and A. Neisa, “A Survey of Systems Engineering Effectiveness - Initial Results,” Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Dissertation 2008. [10] J. P. Elm and D. R. Goldenson, “A Business Case for Systems Engineering Study: Results of the Systems Engineering Effectiveness Survey,” Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, Report 2012. [11] H. Eisner. Essentials of Project and Systems Engineering Management, Second Edition. Wiley, 2002, Chapter 1. [12] Gausemeier, Jürgen, Dumitrescu, Roman, Steffen, Daniel, Czaja, Anja, Wiederkehr, Olga, Tschirner, Christian, Systems Engineering in industrial practice, Paderborn, 2015 [13] S. Hesari, H. Mashayekhi, R. Raman, Towards a General Framework for evaluating Software Development Methodologies. Proc. IEEE 34th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2010 [14] Honour, E. (2008). Systems engineering and complexity. INSIGHT-INCOSE Journal, 11 (1): 20–21 [15] Hornos, Miguel. (2017). Application of Software Engineering techniques to improve the reliability of Intelligent Environments. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments. 3. 1-3. 10.1007/s40860-017- 0043-0. [16] International Council on Systems Engineering, A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, Version 3.2, July 2010. [17] Kossiakoff, A., Sweet, W. N., Seymour, S. J. & Biemer, S. M., Systems Engineering: Principles and Practice. Second Edition ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 2011 [18] J. K. K. Kludze, Jr., “Engineering of Complex Systems: The Impact of Systems Engineering at NASA,” George Washington University, Dissertation 2003. [19] NASA: NASA – Systems Engineering Handbook, NASA/SP-2007-6105 Rev1, 200 A.Santokheeetal. /TowardsaGeneralFramework forEvaluating IEs’Methodologies24