Page - 220 - in Intelligent Environments 2019 - Workshop Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Environments
Image of the Page - 220 -
Text of the Page - 220 -
• Smart cities make extensive use of open data. Should the CPTED data be open to
all?
• Who is liable for wrong or biased CPTED markers? Would, in a security-based
society, the CPTED be used to influence security decisions, eventually not
necessary?
• How can citizens or other actors participate in the CPTED classification of the city
and analyze and modify CPTED decisions?
Those and other legal issues of CPTED are central to their correct application, evaluation
and assessment in a smart city context. All stakeholders should be able to participate in
the process and benefit from its use. For this to be a reality the identified legal issues
should be taken care of and a clear framework defined.
4. Conclusion
The LookCrim application has characteristics derived from the CPTED perspective. By
gathering geo-tagged information, the application’s outputs should prove to be an
invaluable tool for several stakeholders, namely those involved in urban designing and
law enforcement. It is a work in progress not only from a technical point of view, but
also from a legal. The path to the creation of the application gave origin to some concerns
of legal nature, namely privacy, security and possible discrimination, which will be
addressed throughout the project.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within
the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2019.
References
[1] CEN, 2006, CEN 14383 Series, Crime Prevention Through Urban Design and Planning (CP-UDP), Comité
Europeen de Normalisation.
[2] COST, 2014, Review of CEN 1438, COST Action TU1203: Working Group 2 - Crime Prevention through
Urban Design & Planning, October 2014.
[3] Davey, D., Wootton, D., 2014, The Crime Prevention Capability Maturity Model, International
Perspectives of Crime Prevention 6, 7th Annual International Forum, The German Congress on Crime
Prevention , Marc Coester and Erich Marks (eds.), Bielefeld, Germany.
[4] Draper, R. Cadzow, E., 2004, “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design”, PEB Exchange,
Programme on Educational Building, 2004/13, OECD Publishing, Paris.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/605207554154.
[5] Durham City and County, 2002, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: Durham Guide to
Creating a Safer Community, Durham City and County CPTED Task Force.
[6] European Commission, 2006, Planning, urban design and management for crime prevention handbook,
AGIS – Action Safepolis 2006-2007.
[7] Iqbal1, A., Ceccato, V., 2016, Is CPTED Useful to Guide the Inventory of Safety in Parks? A Study Case
in Stockholm, Sweden, International Criminal Justice Review, Vol 26, Issue 2, Sage Publications.
P.M.Freitasetal. /
SmartCitiesandSecurity–APreventiveApproach220
Intelligent Environments 2019
Workshop Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Environments
- Title
- Intelligent Environments 2019
- Subtitle
- Workshop Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Environments
- Authors
- Andrés Muñoz
- Sofia Ouhbi
- Wolfgang Minker
- Loubna Echabbi
- Miguel Navarro-CĂa
- Publisher
- IOS Press BV
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-61499-983-6
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 416
- Category
- Tagungsbände