Page - 220 - in Intelligent Environments 2019 - Workshop Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Environments

• Smart cities make extensive use of open data. Should the CPTED data be open to all? • Who is liable for wrong or biased CPTED markers? Would, in a security-based society, the CPTED be used to influence security decisions, eventually not necessary? • How can citizens or other actors participate in the CPTED classification of the city and analyze and modify CPTED decisions? Those and other legal issues of CPTED are central to their correct application, evaluation and assessment in a smart city context. All stakeholders should be able to participate in the process and benefit from its use. For this to be a reality the identified legal issues should be taken care of and a clear framework defined. 4. Conclusion The LookCrim application has characteristics derived from the CPTED perspective. By gathering geo-tagged information, the application’s outputs should prove to be an invaluable tool for several stakeholders, namely those involved in urban designing and law enforcement. It is a work in progress not only from a technical point of view, but also from a legal. The path to the creation of the application gave origin to some concerns of legal nature, namely privacy, security and possible discrimination, which will be addressed throughout the project. Acknowledgments This work has been supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2019. References [1] CEN, 2006, CEN 14383 Series, Crime Prevention Through Urban Design and Planning (CP-UDP), Comité Europeen de Normalisation. [2] COST, 2014, Review of CEN 1438, COST Action TU1203: Working Group 2 - Crime Prevention through Urban Design & Planning, October 2014. [3] Davey, D., Wootton, D., 2014, The Crime Prevention Capability Maturity Model, International Perspectives of Crime Prevention 6, 7th Annual International Forum, The German Congress on Crime Prevention , Marc Coester and Erich Marks (eds.), Bielefeld, Germany. [4] Draper, R. Cadzow, E., 2004, “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design”, PEB Exchange, Programme on Educational Building, 2004/13, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/605207554154. [5] Durham City and County, 2002, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: Durham Guide to Creating a Safer Community, Durham City and County CPTED Task Force. [6] European Commission, 2006, Planning, urban design and management for crime prevention handbook, AGIS – Action Safepolis 2006-2007. [7] Iqbal1, A., Ceccato, V., 2016, Is CPTED Useful to Guide the Inventory of Safety in Parks? A Study Case in Stockholm, Sweden, International Criminal Justice Review, Vol 26, Issue 2, Sage Publications. P.M.Freitasetal. / SmartCitiesandSecurity–APreventiveApproach220