Page - 216 - in Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte, Volume LIX
Image of the Page - 216 -
Text of the Page - 216 -
Erica
Tietze-conrat216
so that we could see it and described the object;
beat a tattoo with his glasses against the solid
photograph. In his course on Baroque the al-
ternation of the optic and haptic in a façade
impressed itself into our consciousness with the
time beating of a conductor. The introductory
lines which he read had the kind of laconic force
one would never forget; one listened holding
ones breath. A loosening of concentration was
needed and gratefully welcomed in the follow-
ing description of the object. The dogma and its
explaining example, Southern and Northern Ba-
roque: heightened emotion and heightened mo-
tion, heightened emotion and restricted motion;
Bernini, Rembrandt.
Riegl expressly avoided a bigger audience by
scheduling his lectures at hours most awkward for
the students, his seminar for instance between 12
and 2. We had to eat before noon, an unusually
early hour in Vienna, since in these years before
the First World War there was no lunch, only a
midday dinner. It was difficult to concentrate
fighting against an after-eating-sleepiness. And
when we postponed the meal for after the lecture
we had again difficulties to concentrate in the sec-
ond hour because of the gnawing hunger. Riegl’s
seminar was a dialogue which he held with him-
self. He was hard of hearing and, did not want
a discussion with a pupil. He chose the […] of
Bernini, slowly read a passage and commented on
it himself. The impression which this alternation
of text and comment gave to the ear was simi-
lar to that of his lectures, but principally differ-
ent as far as the content was concerned. The text
was not the conclusion but an external statement
which had to be questioned; the loosening up into
Riegl’s accentuated improvised speech was not the text’s example but its clarification. The musical al-
ternation only of two differently oriented voices
had the same impressive effect. I do not want to
be misunderstood; there was nothing theatrical in
Riegl’s method, no show-man ship at all.
The older students were not a great help ei-
ther. Hans Tietze, member of the Institute, had
his desk downstairs. But among the direct col-
leagues there was a prodigy who of course could
have helped us, but was far too jealous and con-
ceited to do so, Robert Eisler36. He was the first
of my colleagues I was able to individualize. His
name was known to me. The summer before,
he had played a minor role as an amateur pho-
tographer in a kind of social scandal which took
place in one of our lake resorts. Eisler looked
like a well groomed, quasi ironed-out philoso-
pher Moses Mendelssohn. His complexion was
so mealy, neither eyes nor brows contrasted with
his highly freckled skin. None of us colleagues
liked him, but we all were with awe before him.
In high school he had already published a book
on the theory of value37 and during his early stu-
dent years an article on Mantegna38 which in my
monograph on this artist’s work39 I accepted.
In this article he gave his title as “fellow” of the
Institute consciously wrongly translating his
modest title “Mitglied”. The only colleague of
mine who saw more of him was L. von Ficker40
[…]. He was not an art historian at heart, but
decided to make his “doctor” in a seemingly eas-
ier field, since his father, a famous professor of
Law in Innsbruck41 in his last will had decreed
to disinherit him in case he did not finish his
University studies before a certain time. L. von
Ficker’s interest was more in literature, especially
poetry, than in art. We tried to supply him with
36 Robert Eisler, geb. am 27.4. 1882 in Wien, gest. am 17. 12. 1949 in England.
37 R. Eisler, Studien zur Werttheorie, Leipzig 1902.
38 R. Eisler, Mantegnas frühe Werke und die römische Antike, in: Monatsberichte über Kunst und Kunstwissen-
schaft, München 1903, S. 159–169.
39 E. Tietze-Conrat, Mantegna, Paintings, Drawings, Engravings, London 1955.
40 Ludwig von Ficker, geb. am 13.4.1880 in München, gest. am 20.3 1967 in Innsbruck.
41 Julius von Ficker (1826–1902) war Jurist und Historiker.
Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte
Volume LIX
Entnommen aus der FWF-E-Book-Library
- Title
- Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte
- Volume
- LIX
- Editor
- Bundesdenkmalamt Wien
- Institut für Kunstgeschichte der Universität Wien
- Publisher
- Böhlau Verlag
- Location
- Wien
- Date
- 2011
- Language
- German, English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-205-78674-0
- Size
- 19.0 x 26.2 cm
- Pages
- 280
- Keywords
- research, baroque art, methodology, modern art, medieval art, historiography, Baraock, Methodolgiem, Kunst, Wien
- Category
- Kunst und Kultur