Page - 108 - in JRFM - Journal Religion Film Media, Volume 02/01
Image of the Page - 108 -
Text of the Page - 108 -
108 | Elham Manea www.jrfm.eu 2016, 2/1, 91–110
can foreign policy and the invasion of Iraq. It would be hard to sustain a claim that
they are working on behalf of an imperial hegemonic Western agenda. And in Britain,
a women’s rights activist with South Asian roots confided to me during my field re-
search in 2013 that in order for her to be able to work in certain closed communities in
East London where forms of extremism are widespread and to have access to women
living there, she has to wear the headscarf. Nothing in these examples seems at all
funny.
In my opinion, these essentialists are the modern embodiment of those nine-
teenth-century orientalists who believed in a civilising mission that would emancipate
the Muslim woman. Both groups see in this woman only her religious identity. Both
consider her a religious entity that is part of another religious whole – the Muslims.
Both deem her to be oppressed, by xenophobic society/the imperial West or by male
Muslims respectively. Both think she needs protection and must be freed – the es-
sentialists insist on her wearing the veil, and the orientalists want to take off her veil.
Finally, both assume that they know best what this woman needs and who should
speak on her behalf – no one but they themselves!
Context matters because it shows that the essentialist discourse on the Muslim
woman and her veil is a construct crafted in isolation from historical, political, social,
and religious contexts. That construct mirrors the essentialists’ self-obsessed and
self-centred image, assumptions, expectations, and ideological battles. Given the rise
of a counter-narrative and contextual knowledge produced by female scholars of Is-
lamic heritage, it is clear that the time is ripe for a paradigm shift.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Al Arabiya TV, 2010, Niqab Is a Custom not a Religious Requirement, 2 April, Program Journalism Gate (Waje-
hat Al Sahafa), in: Arabic, Al Arabyia TV, 2 April 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9uhzGyk9Eg
[accessed 5 May 2013].
Anderson, Benedict, 1991, Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism,
New York: Verso.
Arena, 2013, Burkaverbot: Nötig oder diskriminierend?, 28 September, SRF, http://www.srf.ch/sendungen/
arena/burkaverbot-noetig-oder-diskriminierend [accessed 5 May 2014].
Bakht, Natasha, 2012, Veiled Objections: Facing Public Opposition to the Niqab, in: Beaman, Lori G. (ed.),
Reasonable Accommodation: Managing Religious Diversity, Vancouver: UBC Press, 70–108.
Bennoune, Karima, 2013, Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here. Untold Stories from the Fight against Muslim
Fundamentalism, New York: W.W. Norton.
Bennoune, Karima, 2007, Secularism and Human Rights: A Contextual Analysis of Headscarves, Religious
Expression, and Women’s Equality Under International Law, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,
45, 2, http://ssrn.com/abstract=989066.
Bowen, Innes, 2014, Medina in Birmingham, Najaf in Brent: Inside British Islam, London: Hurst.
JRFM
Journal Religion Film Media, Volume 02/01
- Title
- JRFM
- Subtitle
- Journal Religion Film Media
- Volume
- 02/01
- Authors
- Christian Wessely
- Daria Pezzoli-Olgiati
- Editor
- Uni-Graz
- Publisher
- SchĂĽren Verlag GmbH
- Location
- Graz
- Date
- 2016
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 132
- Categories
- Zeitschriften JRFM