Page - 159 - in Limina - Grazer theologische Perspektiven, Volume 3:2
Image of the Page - 159 -
Text of the Page - 159 -
159 | www.limina-graz.eu
Frank G. Bosman | The turning of Turing’s tables
that he was actually the puppet of an artificial puppet master, just
as Ava was in the player’s eyes. And since the A.I.-controlled player
was unaware of the manipulation, he has passed the test by judg-
ing himself to be human-while-not. Secondly, the passing of the
Turing test is also visible – as was the case with TOM – in the dual
ending of the game.
The player exhibits characteristic human behaviour, or otherwise
formulated, behaviour that would be judged as human by a third
impartial instance, either way. The player may choose to kill both
women, thus exhibiting moral judgement, even in the face of grave
consequences (the death of two, potentially biologically immortal
people), or the player may choose to let TOM/him-/herself (de-
pending on the level of experienced identification between player
and TOM) be killed by the women, even in the face of greater con-
sequence (the death of TOM/the player).
The Chinese Room
Above, I spoke about “characteristic human behaviour” as something the
Turing test would be able to judge, like moral judgement or emotions. In
the original test, however, as TOM faithfully relates, the focal point was the
ability of the A.I. to “have a polite conversation” (“Level B17”). When Ava
asks TOM if he thinks he can pass the test, he replies positively: “I am quite
capable of polite conversation, wouldn’t you say?” The language-oriented
original test has been criticized by – among others – John Searle (1980)
in his famous thought experiment of the Chinese Room, as TOM also re-
lates: “The Turing Test has been criticized. Researchers claim it does not
correctly test a machine’s ability to think, but rather its ability to deceive”
(“Level B18”).
Searle’s experiment (explained in “Level B18”, “Level B19”, and “Level
B20”, and faithfully rendered in the game itself as a physical experiment
in “Chinese Room” between “Level E46” and “Level E47”), conjures up
the idea of a non-Chinese-speaking person sitting in a closed-off room
with nothing but an English instruction manual. Outside the room, there
is a Chinese-speaking person writing notes in Chinese and pushing them
In the original Turing test, the focal point was the ability
of the A.I. to “have a polite conversation”.
Limina
Grazer theologische Perspektiven, Volume 3:2
- Title
- Limina
- Subtitle
- Grazer theologische Perspektiven
- Volume
- 3:2
- Editor
- Karl Franzens University Graz
- Date
- 2020
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- Size
- 21.4 x 30.1 cm
- Pages
- 270
- Categories
- Zeitschriften LIMINA - Grazer theologische Perspektiven