Page - 173 - in >mcs_lab> - Mobile Culture Studies, Volume 2/2020
Image of the Page - 173 -
Text of the Page - 173 -
Mobile Culture Studies. The Journal 6 2o20 (Travel)
Tanja Kapp | Journeying the Page 173
some of the biggest stories of today relate back to that idea of landscape. The most obvious are
climate/environmental change — which stems largely from the way we see ourselves in relation-
ship with the places we inhabit and exploit. And, of course, nationalism and in particular Brexit.
(Qtd. in Tromans, Hornsby and Nicholls 2019: 16–18)5
Hopper examines landscape’s use as a battleground to come to terms with personal or collec-
tive anxieties. Yet, rather than positioning landscape as an empty container or vehicle without
agency, he acknowledges that these contemporary socio-political struggles that increasingly
usher walkers out onto the land often originate from phenomena within which landscape plays
a crucial role. In other words, space and nature prompt us to explore our relationship with them
precisely because they are inextricably linked with our identity and being in the world. Current
political tendencies such as environmentalism and neo-nationalism are inherently tied to how
we view ourselves in relation to spaces, triggering uncertainties about identity, embodiment and
causation. Hopper asserts furthermore that technological improvements in communication and
transportation have resulted in new ways to live and use spaces (qtd. 2019: 18). It is crucial to
understand hereby how these technological changes do not merely fasten or simplify our means
of communication and transportation, but that they fundamentally influence our social and
cognitive existence. They have enabled processes of globalization, which in turn impact nearly
every aspect of our private and professional lives. Anxious about these fundamental changes,
humans make use of both walking and writing as methods to ponder and reimagine ourselves
and our places in the world.
It may be argued that psychogeography has endured through time because of its universal
applicability, which makes it easy to be recontextualized. Considering the positive and negative
effects of that inherent vagueness, Tina Richardson stresses that ‘it is [psychogeography’s] unde-
finable quality that has led to its endurance’ (Richardson 2015: 7). To walk psychogeographi-
cally is to come to terms with how individual identity or culture is enmeshed in the physical
world, providing a means to distil the real and imagined strata of one’s surroundings. Psycho-
geography must not be considered only through the term’s common usage, which especially in
the past was associated exclusively with (white male) privilege, but must be understood more
generally through the notion of walking as a means to disassemble the psychological impact of
place.6 Such a view allows for an extended history of psychogeography, accounting for radical
walking’s significance throughout the history of travel and travel writing. Yet, it is important to
note that psychogeography should not be envisioned as a genealogy of coherent development,
but rather as a conceptual lens through which a wide range of phenomena, related or unrelated,
can be viewed (Coverley 2018: 15). Crucially, Richardson highlights the ‘bricolage nature of
psychogeography’, and links this to the historical impact of alternative walking acting ‘as a kind
of toolbox for contemporary psychogeographers’, rather than a fixed set of ideas from which to
follow (Richardson 2015: 3).
5 The turn towards landscape indicated by the rise of nature writing in the UK is often read as a result of surging
isolationism and patriotism. However, psychogeography and its travelogues are inherently concerned with, on the
one hand, thinking about individual experience, and, on the other, to extract multiple non-hegemonic discourses
attached to a specific place. Hopper further explains that it is the nature of today’s psychogeographical practice
to include the wide-ranging ‘polyphony’ of unheard voices (qtd. in Tromans, Hornsby and Nicholls 2019: 18).
6 Walking in itself remains a highly debated subject of contestation, since the publicness of the act highlights the
identity politics of spaces, especially within urban spheres.
>mcs_lab>
Mobile Culture Studies, Volume 2/2020
The Journal
- Title
- >mcs_lab>
- Subtitle
- Mobile Culture Studies
- Volume
- 2/2020
- Editor
- Karl Franzens University Graz
- Location
- Graz
- Date
- 2020
- Language
- German, English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Size
- 21.0 x 29.7 cm
- Pages
- 270
- Categories
- Zeitschriften Mobile Culture Studies The Journal