Page - 10 - in Media – Migration – Integration - European and North American Perspectives
Image of the Page - 10 -
Text of the Page - 10 -
Horst Pöttker | Successful Integration?
10
practice today: If the history of the Poles in the Rhine-Ruhr area is to be
thought of as a case of successful integration, principles and practices might be
found in both the mainstream and ethnic press of the time that might be
worth emulating today. But if that history proves to be an example of an
unsuccessful integration process, we should focus on structures and practices
that journalism and the media should avoid if they are to encourage and
further the integration process.
Within a tradition stemming from Émile Durkheim’s influential work
(Durkheim 1977, 306-316), social integration forms the basic concept for our
understanding of integration: It is a desired social process that links the
segments of a society (individuals, institutions, groups) by means of their
particular awareness to a united societal whole, in which both similarities and
unity on the one hand, and differences and conflict, on the other, are of
importance. It can readily be seen that this definition, not concerned with
cultural differences among the various parts of the societal whole, differs
fundamentally from the concept of assimilation, which asserts cultural
homogeneity as a precondition for societal unity. This difference becomes
even more evident with the concept of intercultural media integration. For here,
the intensity and content involved in communication between the different
cultural segments of a society, the knowledge – as a result of this
communication – which different societal sectors have of each other,
participation in societal institutions, and the acceptance of basic cultural values
serve as indicators of successful integration (Geißler/Pöttker 2005, 41).
This definition is not only in contrast to the concept of assimilation, but
also to ideas that with regard to migrants and ethnic minorities are not
concerned with the issue of societal unity, but, instead, focus on (individual or
cultural) identity. As the concept of intercultural media integration consciously
focuses not on homogeneity, but on mutual knowledge and communication
about differences, high priority is assigned to discovering what makes society
possible without questioning the identity of the individual or group. Behind
this idea is the premise that societal structures which destroy the identities of
individuals or groups cannot themselves persist for a long period of time.
Within the scope of the approach described in this article, research
methods are closely related to the specific research issues. Section 2 is designed
to determine the degree of success in the integration of the Ruhr Poles. Thus,
data, documents, and literature are subject to analysis here. The two following
sections (3 and 4) deal with reports in the German local press and in the Polish
ethnic press (in the selective translation by the monitoring German authorities)
and summarize the tentative findings of our ongoing quantitative and
qualitative analysis of the specific historical newspapers. Finally, the last section
contains an interpretation of these findings and applies a perspective of
Media – Migration – Integration
European and North American Perspectives
- Title
- Media – Migration – Integration
- Subtitle
- European and North American Perspectives
- Authors
- Rainer Geissler
- Horst Pöttker
- Publisher
- transcript Verlag
- Date
- 2009
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-8376-1032-1
- Size
- 15.0 x 22.4 cm
- Pages
- 250
- Keywords
- Integration, Media, Migration, Europe, North America, Sociology of Media, Sociology
- Category
- Medien