Page - 17 - in options, Volume summer 2019
Image of the Page - 17 -
Text of the Page - 17 -
scenario-planning more than a couple of
years ahead. This exercise has enlightened
the wider integrated assessment modeling
community about what it could offer
the private sector in the future.”
If a climate-related catastrophe hits a
bank, the financial damage can
propagate between institutions.
This phenomenon – systemic risk –
arises because they are interlinked
by networks of credit. After the
financial crisis of 2007–2008, it
became clear that this mesh of
credit obligations meant that, if
one collapsed, others could
rapidly follow. Since then,
regulators have taken precautions
against future crises, partly by requiring
banks to hold a capital cushion.
In 2016, IIASA researchers Sebastian
Poledna and Stefan Thurner however
demonstrated that this approach doesn’t
work. Systemic risk arises because of the
multiple transactions going on in the
financial markets. You can only control
the problem by rearranging those
obligations or links.
Their solution was to levy a charge on
transactions based on the level of risk that
each added to the system – a systemic risk
tax. Poledna modeled the effects of such
a levy, demonstrating that it would drive
the network into safer behavior and
even eliminate the risk of collapse.
In another study, IIASA Young Scientists
Summer Program participant Anton Pichler
and colleagues demonstrated how to halve
systemic risk without damaging individual
banks by rearranging institutions’ portfolios
while keeping their overall size and risk profile the same. They simulated a government
bond market where financial institutions
had common asset holdings. This overlap
meant that, when one went bankrupt
and sold its portfolio, there was a wave of
collapses. After rearranging the portfolios,
however, there was not a single default.
“Nudging portfolio changes in real life
would take something akin to a systemic
risk tax,” says Poledna.
Regulators concerned with systemic
risk have focused on the financial sector
but systems analysis shows that it is of even
greater concern in the non-financial sector.
This was the surprising finding after Poledna
and colleagues devoted 18 months to building
a model of all the credit links within the
entire Austrian business sector – 170,000
companies and banks.
In the model, they
allocated every firm
and bank a “DebtRank” –
the degree to which its
own financial distress
would transmit to the
network. While large
banks topped the list,
some medium-sized,
non-financial firms were
also important. One
ranked as high as eighth
because its default would affect almost
40% of the Austrian economy. “Overall, non-
financial firms contributed 55% of the
risk, something that regulators need
to consider,” says Poledna.
Modelers are proving their worth in
insurance, climate-related risks, and
systemic risk but Thurner believes
regulators are not moving fast enough, at
least as far as the latter is concerned.
“By now it’s becoming obvious to everyone
that worldwide, systemic risk levels are
rising, even though the current regulation
scheme is getting tighter and tighter,” he
says. “Maybe after the next crisis people will
really rethink how we are doing things.”
Further info:
Ermoliev YM, Robinson SM, Rovenskaya E, & Ermolieva T
(2018). Integrated Catastrophic Risk Management:
Robust Balance between Ex-ante and Ex-post Measures.
SIAM News 51 (6): p. 4. [pure.iiasa.ac.at/15426/]
Poledna S, Hinteregger A, & Thurner S (2018). Identifying
Systemically Important Companies by Using the Credit
Network of an Entire Nation. Entropy 20 (10): p. 792.
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/15540]
Elena Rovenskaya: rovenska@iiasa.ac.at
Sebastian Poledna: poledna@iiasa.ac.at
Stefan Thurner: thurner@iiasa.ac.at 109 1010 1011
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Totalassets (EUR)
Banks Firms
By now it’s becoming
obvious to everyone that
worldwide, systemic
risk levels are rising,
even though the current
regulation scheme is
getting tighter and tighter
SEBASTIAN POLEDNA,
IIASA RESEARCHER DebtRank of firms (dark green) and banks
(light green) plotted against their total assets
(as a proxy for firm size) in Euros.
www.iiasa.ac.at 17OptionsSummer
2019
back to the
book options, Volume summer 2019"
options
Volume summer 2019
- Title
- options
- Volume
- summer 2019
- Location
- Laxenburg
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- Size
- 21.0 x 29.7 cm
- Pages
- 32
- Categories
- Zeitschriften Options Magazine