Page - 17 - in options, Volume summer 2020
Image of the Page - 17 -
Text of the Page - 17 -
To answer this question, researchers must include in the
same model the costs of cutting carbon emissions (mitigation),
adaptation, and building climate resilience, as well as the cost
of the destruction that will ensue if we do none of these things,
and the residual damage that will happen even if we do. IIASA
researcher Thomas Schinko led an international research team
costing the potentially huge financial impacts of coastal flooding
due to rising seas. The problem is that the cost of fighting coastal
flooding is also high in terms of cutting emissions, and building
defenses and resilient infrastructure.
“Sea level rise is one of the highest climate-related risks
because you have so many effects related to it, like coastal erosion,
flooding, storm surges, and the intrusion of salt water into
agricultural land,” says Schinko.
The team used different economic models to
compare two scenarios – the costs to global GDP
of coastal flooding and storm surges if the world
invests in capping temperature rise below 2°C;
and the same costs if current policies continue
and temperature rises further. At the same time,
they considered the effect on GDP of building
dykes along the world’s coastlines.
In the first half of this century, capping
temperature makes little difference to the economic
burden of coastal flooding. Adaptation, however, more By Aisling Irwin
Further info:
Gaupp F, Hall J, Hochrainer-Stigler S, & Dadson S (2019). Changing risks of
simultaneous global breadbasket failure. Nature Climate Change 10: 54-57.
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/16205]
Schinko T, Drouet L, Vrontisi Z, Hof AF, Hinkel J, Mochizuki J, Bosetti V, Fragkiadakis
K, et al. (2020). Economy-wide effects of coastal flooding due to sea level rise:
A multi-model simultaneous treatment of mitigation, adaptation, and residual
impacts. Environmental Research Communications 2 (1): e015002.
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/16265]
Budolfson M, Dennig F, Fleurbaey M, Scovronick N, Siebert A, Spears D, & Wagner F
(2019). Optimal Climate Policy and the Future of World Economic Development.
The World Bank Economic Review 33 (1): 21-40. [pure.iiasa.ac.at/15327]
Franziska Gaupp: gaupp@iiasa.ac.at
Thomas Schinko: schinko@iiasa.ac.at
Fabian Wagner: wagnerf@iiasa.ac.at
than pays for itself, with GDP suffering more if we don’t adapt
than if we do.
The picture however changes dramatically after 2050, when
strong mitigation and adaptation leave us better off economically
in the decades leading up to 2100 than doing nothing. In GDP
terms, it’s a global loss of 0.5% compared with 4%.
“We have to think long-term but
act swiftly” — Thomas Schinko
“The problem with this kind of conclusion is that it assumes
that the people of today care about the people of 2100. If you
are short-term orientated and you say: I don’t care about climate
change beyond 2050, then you have a high “discounting rate”
and you are blind to the need to mitigate. If you do care about the
future, then in the extreme case, what happens in 2100 has
equal weight for you as what happens next year. Most people
lie somewhere in between,” comments IIASA researcher
Fabian Wagner.
It matters because it influences political decisions about
fighting climate change. Modelers can help by putting
assumptions about how much the average person socially
discounts the future into economic models. For example, a
model could be asked what needs to be done now to ensure
that the people of 2100 have sufficient food.
Wagner and his team found some deficiencies
in current models. Population projections, for
example, have not taken account of the
dawning realization that fertility is not
declining as swiftly as anticipated in
sub-Saharan Africa.
By refining inputs such as these,
the group has shown that, even to
ensure a minimal level of economic
welfare for the people of 2100,
we need to cut our emissions far
more aggressively, accelerate
human and economic development,
and reduce fertility levels.
“If we make the demographic
transition quickly,” says Wagner, “we
can spend less on climate mitigation.”
© Adam Islaam | IIASA and Filonov | Dreamstime
17Optionswww.iiasa.ac.at
Summer 2020
back to the
book options, Volume summer 2020"
options
Volume summer 2020
- Title
- options
- Volume
- summer 2020
- Location
- Laxenburg
- Date
- 2020
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- Size
- 21.0 x 29.7 cm
- Pages
- 32
- Categories
- Zeitschriften Options Magazine