Page - 59 - in Pflegeroboter

593 Erfahrungen aus dem Einsatz von Pflegerobotern … Bohren, J., Rusu, R. B., Jones, E. G., Marder-Eppstein, E., Pantofaru, C., Wise, M., … Holzer, S. (2011). Towards autonomous robotic butlers: Lessons learned with the PR2. In 2011 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (S. 5568–5575). Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psy- chology, 3(2), 77–101. Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627–652. Broadbent, E., Kerse, N., Peri, K., Robinson, H., Jayawardena, C., Kuo, T., et al. (2016). Benefits and problems of health-care robots in aged care settings: A comparison trial. Australasian Jour- nal on Ageing, 35(1), 23–29. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4), 319–330. Broadbent, E., Tamagawa, R., Patience, A., Knock, B., Kerse, N., Day, K., et al. (2012). Attitu- des towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31(2), 115–120. Bundesamt für Statistik (Hrsg.). (2017). Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung Deutschland- ergebnisse (Statistisches Bundesamt/Januar 2017). Pflegestatistik 2015. Wiesbaden: Bundesamt für Statistik. Chang, S., & Sung, H. (2013). The effectiveness of paro robot therapy on mood of older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 11(3), 216. Compagna, D., Derpmann, S., Mauz, K., & Shire, K. A. (2009). Zwischenergebnisse der Bedarfs- analyse für den Einsatz von Servicerobotik in einer Plegeeinrichtung: Routine- vs. Pflege- tätigkeiten. In: Working Brief 7/2009. https://www.uni-due.de/imperia/md/content/wimi-care/ wb__7_.pdf. Zugegriffen: 07. Febr. 2018. Cumming, R. G., Salkeld, G., Thomas, M., & Szonyi, G. (2000). Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, sf-36 scores, and nursing home admission. The Jour- nals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 55(5), M299–M305. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L. (1993). Wizard of Oz studies – why and how. Knowledge- based systems, 6(4), 258–266. Delia, J. G. (1975). Regional dialect, message acceptance, and perceptions of the speaker. Commu- nication Studies, 26(3), 188–194. Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage verlag. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthro- pomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., Ruiter, L. de, & Hegel, F. (2012). ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE inter- nationalconference on Human-Robot Interaction (S. 125–126). Fischinger, D., Einramhof, P., Papoutsakis, K., Wohlkinger, W., Mayer, P., Panek, P., et al. (2016). Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons lear- ned. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75,60–78. Fischinger, D., Einramhof, P., Wohlkinger, W., Papoutsakis, K., Mayer, P., Panek, P.,et al. (2013). Hobbit – The mutual care robot. In Workshop – Proceedings of ASROB. Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2004). Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 25–59. Frennert, S., Eftring, H., & Östlund, B. (2017). Case report: Implications of doing research on socially assistive robots in real homes. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1–15.