Page - 246 - in Pflegeroboter

246 H. Becker Literatur Becker, H., Scheermesser, M., Früh, M., Treusch, Y., Auerbach, H., Hüppi, R. A., & Meier, F. (2013). Robotik in Betreuung und Gesundheitsversorgung. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag. Beer. J. M., & Takayama, L. (2011). Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Accep- tance, benefits, and concerns. Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction Conference: HRI 2011, S. 19–26 Lausanne, Switzerland. Beer, T., Bleses, H., & Ziegler, S. (2015). Personen mit Demenz und robotische Assistenzsysteme. Pflege & Gesellschaft, 20, 20–36 Birks. M., Bodak, M., Barlas, J., Harwood, J., & Pether, M. (2016). Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: A qualitative study. Journal of Aging Research. doi: https://doi. org/10.1155/2016/8569602. Broadbent, E., Kuo, I. H., Lee, Y. I., Rabindran, J., Kerse, N., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. A. (2010). Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health, 16, 608–613. Brunner, I., Skouen, J. S., Hofstad, H., Aßmuss, J., Becker, F., Pallesen, H., Thijs, L., & Verhey- den, G. (2016). Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content. BMC Neurology, 16, 219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y. Burger, S. (2014). Ik ben Alice. Niederlande: Dokumentarfilm. Butter, M., Rensma, A., Boxsel, J., Kalisingh, S., Schoona, M., Leis, M., Gelderblom, G. J., Cre- mers, G., Wilt, M., Kortekaas, W., Thielmann, A., Cuhls, K., Sachinopoulou, A., & Korhonen, I. (2008). Robotics for healthcare. European Commission, DG Information Society. Cook, A. M., Adams, K., Volden, J., Harbottle, N., & Harbottle, C. (2011). Using Lego robots to estimate cognitive ability in children who have severe physical disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6, 338–346. Dautenhahn, K (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Phi- losophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Sciences, 362, 679–704. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived easeofuse, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly,13, 319–340 Faucounau, V., Wu, Y.-H., Boulay, M., Maestrutti, M., & Rigaud, A. S. (2009). Caregivers’ require- ments for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cogni- tive impairment. Technology & Health Care, 17, 33–40. Frennert, S., Eftring, H., & Östlund, B. (2013). What older people expect of robots: A mixed met- hods approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8239, 19–29. Frennert, S., Forsberg, A., & Östlund, B. (2013). Elderly people’s perceptions of a telehealthcare system: Relative advantage, compatibility, complexity and observability. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 31, 218–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2013.814557. Furniere, A. (20. Februar 2018). Robot Zora cares for the elderly in Flanders’ rest homes. Flanders today. http://www.flanderstoday.eu/innovation/robot-zora-cares-elderly-flanders-rest-homes. Goransson, O., Pettersson, K., Larsson, P. A., & Lennernas, B. (2008). Personals attitudes towards robot assisted health care – A pilot study in 111 respondents. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, 137, 56–60. Harrefors, C., Axelsson, K., & Sävenstedt, S. (2010). Using assistive technology services at diffe- ring levels of care: Healthy older couples’ perceptions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 1523– 1532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2648.2010.05335.x. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2, 361–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5.