Page - 163 - in Siting Futurity - The “Feel Good” Tactical Radicalism of Contemporary Culture in and around Vienna
Image of the Page - 163 -
Text of the Page - 163 -
163
#Hallstatt
In 2012, Austrians were made aware that cloning was no
longer merely the stuff of blockbuster films, nor restricted to
sheep and CGI-generated dinosaurs. Rather, they learned that
when it comes to places, it has become something of a Chinese
speciality. Much to the shock of its citizens, who numbered 778
as of January 1, 2018, but were slightly more numerous in 2012,
Hallstatt, a tiny, über-picturesque village in Austria’s Salzkam-
mergut, a tourist region “famous for its pristine alpine scenery,
lakes, mountains, and church steeples towering over villages
and small towns” (Reisenleitner 2017, 201–2), was turned into
what Bianca Bosker, in Original Copies: Architectural Mimicry in
Contemporary China, calls a “simulacrascape” (4): a themed en-
vironment built to look like a famous site in “the West.” Called
“Hallstatt See — Huizhuo” [五矿·哈施塔特], the “made in Chi-
na” gated-community version of Hallstatt came about rather by
chance. The wife of the CEO of Minmetals Land Inc., the real
estate branch of China’s largest metals trader, was often in Aus-
tria as she was a huge fan of classical music, and upon visiting
Hallstatt, she was so taken by its beauty that she convinced her
husband to replicate it (Fischer-Schreiber 2014). Hallstatt See
was built at an estimated cost of us$ 940 million (Zeveloff and
Johnson 2012) and located in Boluo, a city of 820,000 that has
been described as “a run down sort of place with a factory town
feel” (Shepard 2012b). Boluo is in turn in the larger, 4.6 million
municipality of Huizhou, a two-hour drive north of Hong Kong
in the booming industrial heartland of China’s southern Guang-
dong province on the South China Sea.
Paradoxically, the original Austrian Hallstatt has managed to
maintain its uniqueness by being copied. It serves as the culmi-
nation of this study because the way it has responded to being
turned into a simulacrascape is instructive in its postmodern
pragmatism and lack of clonophobia, the fear of cloning that
W.T.J. Mitchell addresses in Cloning Terror: The War of Imag-
es, 9/11 to the Present. Generic, “usual suspect” Chinese “copy
towns” exist in multiples, such as Chengdu’s British Town,
which was completed in 2005 and modelled on Dorchester (Pat-
erson 2011); Thames Town just outside Shanghai — a prototypi-
back to the
book Siting Futurity - The “Feel Good” Tactical Radicalism of Contemporary Culture in and around Vienna"
Siting Futurity
The “Feel Good” Tactical Radicalism of Contemporary Culture in and around Vienna
- Title
- Siting Futurity
- Subtitle
- The “Feel Good” Tactical Radicalism of Contemporary Culture in and around Vienna
- Author
- Susan Ingram
- Publisher
- punctumbooks
- Location
- New York
- Date
- 2021
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-953035-48-6
- Size
- 12.6 x 20.2 cm
- Pages
- 224
- Keywords
- activism, Austria, contemporary art, contemporary theater, protest culture, radicalism, social protest, Vienna
- Category
- Geographie, Land und Leute
Table of contents
- Preface 11
- Introduction 19
- 1. (Re)Forming Vienna’s Culture of Resistance: The Proletenpassions @ #Arena 39
- 2. Converting Kebab and Currency into Community on Planet #Ottakring 57
- 3. Lazarus’s Necropolitical Afterlife at Vienna’s #Volkstheater 81
- 4. Hardly Homemad(e): #Schlingensief’s Container 101
- 5. From Grand Hotels to Tiny Treasures: Wes Anderson and the Ruin Porn Worlds of Yesterday 119
- 6. Capitalism, Schizophrenia, and #Vanlife: The Alpine Edukation of Hans Weingarter 143
- 7. #Hallstatt: Welcome to Jurassic World 161
- Bibliography 189
- Filmography 215