Seite - 21 - in Europe's online encyclopaedias - Equal access to knowledge of general interest?
Europe's online encyclopaedias
Equal access to knowledge of general interest?
- Titel
- Europe's online encyclopaedias
- Untertitel
- Equal access to knowledge of general interest?
- Autor
- Naja Bentzen
- Herausgeber
- EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service
- Datum
- 2018
- Sprache
- englisch
- ISBN
- 978-92-846-2546-8
- Abmessungen
- 21.0 x 29.7 cm
- Seiten
- 40
- Kategorien
- International
- Tagungsbände
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1. Introduction:Knowledge–a cornerstone of democracy 4
- 1.1. Cognitive resilience in an era of 'junk news' and disinformation 4
- 1.1.1. Increasing need for reliable resources amid growing mistrust 4
- 1.1.2. The role of social media as vehicles for spreading false information 6
- 1.1.3. The need for accessible, reliable information in citizens' mother tongue 6
- 1.1.4. Mother-tongue languages spoken in Europe 7
- 1.1.5. The impact of online presence on the survival of European languages 7
- 1.2. The power of knowledge intermediators 8
- 1.2.1. Google: a reliable tool for citizen fact-checkers? 9
- 1.2.2. Despite changed algorithms, Google's selection methods still raise questions 9
- 1.2.3. A conspiracy theory case study: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion 10
- 2. The roots and roles of European encyclopaedias 10
- 2.1.1. Encyclopaedias as a cultural commodity 11
- 2.1.2. Online encyclopaedias in an era of hybrid warfare: a 'territory of truth'? 12
- 3. Wikipedia 12
- 3.1. The free encyclopaedia that anyone can edit 12
- 3.1.1. Ownership 14
- 3.1.2. Fundamental principles 14
- 3.1.3. Wikipedia's reliability 14
- 3.1.4. Vandalism onWikipedia 15
- 3.1.5. Wikipedia's current crisis– is the concept of knowledge endangered? 15
- 3.2. Wikipedia as an information battlefield 15
- 3.2.1. The crisis in Ukraine and MH17 15
- 3.2.2. Turkey's Wikipedia ban 16
- 3.2.3. China to rival Wikipedia with a 'Great Wall of culture' 16
- 3.2.4. Russia's alternative to Wikipedia to portray Russia 'objectively and accurately' 16
- 4.The 'alternative' right-wing extremist encyclopaedia 17
- 5. European online encyclopaedias 17
- 6. European encyclopaedias: an untapped potential? 19
- 7. Annex: EU Member States' online encyclopaedias 21
- 7.1. Belgium 21
- 7.2. Bulgaria 21
- 7.3. Czech Republic 21
- 7.4. Denmark 22
- 7.5. Germany 22
- 7.6. Estonia 22
- 7.7. Ireland 23
- 7.8. Greece 23
- 7.9. Spain 24
- 7.10. France 24
- 7.11. Croatia 25
- 7.12. Italy 25
- 7.13. Cyprus 26
- 7.14. Latvia 26
- 7.15. Lithuania 27
- 7.16. Luxembourg 27
- 7.17. Hungary 27
- 7.18. Malta 28
- 7.19. The Netherlands 28
- 7.20. Austria 28
- 7.21. Poland 29
- 7.22. Portugal 29
- 7.23. Romania 29
- 7.24. Slovenia 30
- 7.25. Slovakia 30
- 7.26. Finland 30
- 7.27. Sweden 30
- 7.28. United Kingdom 31
- 8. Online encyclopaedias in other languages spoken in Europe 31
- 8.1. Albania 31
- 8.2. Belarus 31
- 8.3. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 32
- 8.4. Norway 32
- 8.5. Russia 33
- 8.6. Serbia/Montenegro/Bosnia 34
- 8.7. Switzerland 34
- 8.8. Turkey 34
- 8.9. Ukraine 35