Seite - 151 - in Freshwater Microplastics - Emerging Environmental Contaminants?

100.GouinT,AvalosJ,BrunningIetal (2015)Useofmicro-plasticbeads incosmeticproducts in Europe and their estimated emissions to theNorthSea environment. SOFW-J141:40–46 101.MayorgaE,SeitzingerSP,HarrisonJAet al (2010)Globalnutrient export fromWaterSheds 2 (NEWS2):model development and implementation. EnvironModelSoftw25:837–853 102. SeitzingerSP,MayorgaE,BouwmanAFetal (2010)Global rivernutrient export: a scenario analysis of past and future trends.GlobalBiogeochemCycles 24:GB0A08 103.Fekete BM,Wisser D, Kroeze C et al (2010)Millennium ecosystem assessment scenario drivers (1970–2050):climateandhydrologicalalterations.GlobalBiogeochemCycles24(4). doi:10.1029/2009GB003593 104.BouwmanAF,BeusenAHW,BillenG (2009)Human alteration of the global nitrogen and phosphorus soil balances for the period 1970–2050. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23(4). doi:10.1029/2009GB003576 105.VanDrechtG,BouwmanAF,HarrisonJ,KnoopJM(2009)Globalnitrogenandphosphate in urban wastewater for the period 1970 to 2050. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23(4). doi:10. 1029/2009GB003458 106.Liu HH, Cohen Y (2014) Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nano- materials. EnvironSciTechnol 48:3281–3292 107. SherringtonC,DarrahC,HannSet al (2016)Study to support thedevelopmentofmeasures to combat a range ofmarine litter sources. Report for European commissionDG environ- ment.EunomiaResearch&Consulting,Bristol 108.Meesters JAJ, Veltman K, Hendriks AJ, van deMeent D (2013) Environmental exposure assessment of engineered nanoparticles: why REACH needs adjustment. Integr Environ AssessManag9:e15–e26 109.Quik JTK, de Klein JJM, Koelmans AA (2015) Spatially explicit fate modelling of nano- materials in naturalwaters.WaterRes 80:200–208 110.ClemmensAJ,HollyFMJr, SchuurmansW(1993)Description and evaluation of program: duflow. J IrrigDrainEng119:724–734 111.David I, Beilicci E, Beilicci R (2015)Basics for hydraulicmodelling of flood runoff using advanced hydroinformatic tools. In: Extreme weather and impacts of climate change on water resources in theDobrogea region. IGIGlobal, pp205–239 112.Dale AL, Lowry GV, Casman EA (2015) Stream dynamics and chemical transformations control the environmental fate of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles in a watershed-scale model. EnvironSciTechnol 49:7285–7293 113.Klimisch H-J, Andreae M, Tillmann U (1997) A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25:1–5 114.Kase R,KorkaricM,Werner I,ÅgerstrandM (2016) Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicitydata(CRED):comparisonandperceptionof theKlimischandCREDmethodsfor evaluating reliability and relevance of ecotoxicity studies.EnvironSciEur 28(1):7 115.Rocha-Santos T,DuarteAC (2015)A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fateandthebehaviorofmicroplastics in theenvironment.TrACTrendsAnal Chem65:47–53 116. Imhof HK, Ivleva NP, Schmid J et al (2013) Contamination of beach sediments of a sub- alpine lakewithmicroplastic particles.CurrBiol 23:R867–R868 117.Kroeze C, Gabbert S, Hofstra N et al Global modelling of surface water quality: a multi- pollutant approach.CurrOpinEnvironSustain 23:35–45 118. JacobsR,MeestersJAJ, terBraakCJFetal (2016)Combiningexposureandeffectmodelling into an integrated probabilistic environmental risk assessment for nanoparticles. Environ ToxicolChem35:2958–2967 119.KlaineSJ,KoelmansAA,HorneNetal (2012)Paradigmstoassess theenvironmental impact ofmanufactured nanomaterials. EnvironToxicolChem31:3–14 120.KoelmansAA,DiepensNJ,Velzeboer I et al (2015)Guidance for theprognostic riskassess- ment of nanomaterials in aquatic ecosystems.SciTotalEnviron535:141–149 Modeling theFate andTransport of PlasticDebris inFreshwaters:Reviewand. . . 151