Seite - 157 - in Freshwater Microplastics - Emerging Environmental Contaminants?
Bild der Seite - 157 -
Text der Seite - 157 -
aquatic larvaeofChironomusriparius ingest abroadsize rangeofMPs implyinga
relative nonselective feeding on sediment components (Table 1 [16]). Surface-
grazing gastropods Physella acuta and Potamopyrgus antipodarum as well as
the shredder Gammarus pulex have also been shown to ingest MPs through
water-/sediment-borne (P. acuta and G. pulex [16]) and food-associated
(P. antipodarum andG.pulex [17]) exposure routes. It is unknown if these results
are relevant for other benthic deposit feeders considering the diverse ecological
niches and feeding types (e.g., collector-gatherer, filter-gatherer, shredders,
scrapers).
Ananalysisof studiesonMPingestionbyfreshwater species indicates that their
general role in the food web (generalist vs. specialized feeders) may determine
dietary MP uptake. Generalists (e.g., Daphnia sp.) or deposit feeders like the
dipteran C. riparius frequently ingested MPs in laboratory experiments, while
this is not the case formore specialized raptorial and carnivorous feeders like the
cyclopoidcopepodMesocyclopssp., therotiferAsplanchnasp.aswellas theciliate
Didinium sp. (Table 1). However, given the potential of MPs to enter complex
aquatic foodwebs at low trophic levels, an indirect ingestion via the prey is also
likely for carnivorous predators. For instance, the transfer of MPs via prey was
observed in food chain experiments with D. magna and Chaoborus flavicans
(personal observation). While the predator C. flavicans did not directly ingest
suspended MPs (PS beads, 10 μm), the feeding of MP-containing daphnids
(pre-fedonMPs) resulted in an indirect uptakeof 10μmMPs.
Table 1 (continued)
Uptake (P Ind−1 h−1) Species
Insecta
Yes (0.05–15.6) Chironomus ripariush
No –
Mollusca
Yes (0.16–104) Anodonta cygneaw,Physella acutah,Potamopyrgus antipodarumI,
Sphaeriumcorneumu1–10
No Sphaeriumcorneumu90
Pisces
Yes Cathorops agassiziin,Cathorops spixiin,Eucinostomusmelanopteruso,
Eugerres brasilianuso,Diapterus rhombeuso,Dorosomacepedianumq,
Sciades herzbergiin,Stellifer brasiliensism,Stellifer stelliferm
No –
a [9], carboxylatedmicrospheres 0.57μm; b [10], plainmicrospheres 0.5μm; c [11], latex beads
0.57–1.05μm;d[12],PSspheres0.5,3,and6μm;e [13], carboxylatedPSspheres0.51μm;f [14],
PS spheres 6.5μm(f+) flavored (f−) non-flavored; g [15], carboxylated spheres 2.1, 6.2, 10.8, and
19.4μm;h [16],PSspheres1,10,and90μm; i [17],polymethylmethacrylat29.5±26μm;k [18],
PEparticlesandPPfibers10–75μm;m[19],fieldstudy,nylonropefibers;n [20],fieldstudy,nylon
fragments; o [21], field study, nylon fragments; q [22],microspheres 10–82μm; s [23], PSbeads,
0.05,0.5, and6μm;upers. observation,PSbeads1,10, and90μm;wpers. observation,PSbeads
and fragments 5–90μm.Superscript numbers indicate particle sizes
Interactions ofMicroplasticswithFreshwaterBiota 157
Freshwater Microplastics
Emerging Environmental Contaminants?
- Titel
- Freshwater Microplastics
- Untertitel
- Emerging Environmental Contaminants?
- Autoren
- Martin Wagner
- Scott Lambert
- Verlag
- Springer Open
- Datum
- 2018
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-61615-5
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 316
- Kategorien
- Naturwissenschaften Chemie