Seite - 2760 - in Schriften von Sigmund Freud - (1856–1939)

»Beitrag zur materialistischen Geschichtstheorie«. [204] Fison (1880, 165), bei Lang (1905). [205] Vgl. oben die Abhandlung über das Tabu, S. 345  ff. [206] Reinach (1905–12, Bd. 1, 41). [207] Haddon (1902), bei Frazer (1910, Bd. 4, 50). [208] »There is nothing vague or mystical about it, nothing of that metaphysical haze which some writers love to conjure up over the humble beginnings of human speculation, but which is utterly foreign to the simple, sensuous and concrete modes of thought of the savage.« (Frazer, 1910, Bd. 1, 117.) [209] L’année sociologique, Bd. I, V, VIII und an anderen Stellen. S. besonders die Abhandlung ›Sur le totémisme‹, Bd. V (1902). [210] The Golden Bough (1890), Bd. 2, 332 ff. [211] »It is unlikely that a community of savages should deliberately parcel out the realm of nature into provinces, assign euch province to a particular band of magicians, and bid all the bands to work their magic and weave their spells for the common good.« (Frazer, 1910, Bd. 4, 57.) [212] Frazer (1910, Bd. 2, 89 ff., und Bd. 4, 59). [213] »That belief is a philosophy far from primitive.« (A. Lang, 1905, 192.) [214] Bei Frazer (1910, Bd. 4, 45 f.). [215] S. die Kritik der Erörterungen Durkheims bei Frazer (1910, Bd. 4, 100  ff.). [216] Zum Beispiel Frazer (1910, Bd. 4, 75): »The totemic clan is a totally different social organism from the exogamous clan, and we have good grounds for thinking that it is far older.« [217] »Improper because it was unusual.« [218] Vgl. die erste Abhandlung. [219] Morgan (1877). – Frazer (1910, Bd. 4, 105 ff.). [220] (1906–08, Bd. 2.) Dort auch die Verteidigung des Autors gegen ihm bekannt gewordene Einwendungen. [221] Vgl. Durkheim (1898). [222] Ch. Darwin meint von den Wilden: »they are not likely to reflect on distant evils to their progeny.« 2760