Seite - 85 - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Bild der Seite - 85 -
Text der Seite - 85 -
is more accessible through the articulation of its concepts and constructs, and the need
for such theories in health informatics and other domains is rising due to growing
complexity of joint social and technical systems, distributed cognition is ready and
relevant for grappling with twenty first century issues.
Following Halverson’s [19] four categories for assessing the utility of theory: we
believe distributed cognition provides descriptive power (e.g. DiCoT helped describe
and make sense of activities through distributed cognition concepts and principles);
rhetorical power (e.g. in terms of argumentation DiCoT-CL helped frame and articulate
how macro level decisions were having negative downstream impact on the haematology
ward); inferential power (e.g. we infer that patients who are most likely to use PHIMed
would be those who experience complex and fragmented healthcare services); and
application power (e.g. targeting PHIMed interventions towards patients with complex
and fragmented care could have a higher likelihood of impact and changing the
configuration of the pre-alarm on the haematology ward could have a positive impact on
staff and patients, both of which could be tested).
Teaching questions for reflection
1. What tools and artefacts related to health informatics exemplify how an
individual’s cognition extends into the environment?
2. What complex sociotechnical systems can you describe that have important
aspects of health informatics within them?
3. How would a research project evaluating electronic health records look
different when planned from a traditional individualistic perspective versus a
distributed cognition perspective?
4. What are the strengths and weaknesses of distributed cognition theory?
Funding
This work was supported by Pharmacy Research UK grant [PRUK-2016-PG2-2-A], by
the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G059063/1] and by
the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) grant [12/209/27], from the Health
Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) stream. The research is also supported by the
NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. The views expressed are
those of the authors and not necessarily those of Pharmacy Research UK, the NHS, the
NIHR or the Department of Health and Care.
References
[1] E. Hutchins. Cognition in the Wild. MIT press.1995
[2] J. Hollan, E. Hutchins, D. Kirsh. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer
interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), (2000), 174-196.
[3] D. Furniss, A. Blandford. Understanding emergency medical dispatch in terms of distributed cognition:
a case study. Ergonomics 49 (2006), 1174–203.
[4] N.V. Flor, E.L. Hutchins. Analysing Distributed Cognition in Software Teams: A Case Study of Team
Programming during Adaptive Software Maintenance. Reading in Groupware and Computer supported
Cooperative Work. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufman. 1991.
D.Furniss etal. /DistributedCognition:UnderstandingComplexSociotechnical Informatics 85
zurück zum
Buch Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners"
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Titel
- Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
- Untertitel
- Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Autoren
- Philip Scott
- Nicolette de Keizer
- Andrew Georgiou
- Verlag
- IOS Press BV
- Ort
- Amsterdam
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-61499-991-1
- Abmessungen
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Seiten
- 242
- Kategorie
- Informatik