Seite - 89 - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Bild der Seite - 89 -
Text der Seite - 89 -
organizational studies and was developed by science and technology scholars Bruno
Latour, Michael Callon and John Law. ANT researchers view the world as consisting of
networks made up of human and non-human actors. Non-human actors include objects
and concepts. The central (and in some cases seen as somewhat controversial)
assumption is that non-human and human actors should be treated as equal and that
objects have agency (i.e. an ability to exert power over or change in other non-human or
human actors) [7]. The ability to have power is assumed to emerge from the way actors
are connected and is not assumed to stem from inherent actor characteristics [8].
However, this agency is not inherent to objects on their own – rather it emerges from the
way they are related to other objects, concepts and human actors in the network. Both
human and non-human actors can be a component of a network but also a network in
themselves, depending on the level of granularity the ANT researcher wishes to study.
Box 2 provides an overview of the most common terminology used in ANT. The terms
provide an overview of the principles of ANT and they are listed for easy reference.
Box 2: Key terminology used in ANT
Actor: the origin of action (can be human or non-human)
Network: relationships between actors
Black-boxing: treating a particular network as a separate unit and specifying inputs
and outputs as well as their relationship with the whole network
Intermediary: an individual that serves as a connection between two actors
Translation: process by which actors configure and re-configure each other
Simplification: composition of networks tends to reveal itself when things in a
network go wrong and that they tend to be hidden when things go smoothly
Punctualization: process of revealing simplifications
In ANT, social phenomena are assumed to be the outcome of associations between
actors [7], and the sociologist studying networks is simply seen as a component of the
network. Therefore, ANT in its original “purist” form has been viewed as incompatible
with interpretivist sociological approaches [7].
ANT scholars study the makeup and the shifting nature of networks and their
components [3,9]. Typically, this involves focusing on some goal-directed collective
activity, mapping network components, and in some cases specifying network inputs and
outputs [3,8]. Based on this, it is assumed that researchers can make recommendations
on how networks can achieve stability and how actors need to be re-configured to achieve
a certain organizational aim. The stability of networks is assumed to be determined by
the strength of relationships between actors [10].
Just as in overall sociotechnical approaches, networks are assumed to change and
re-configure with the introduction of new technology (a new actor) in the organization
[11]. Through tracing networks and investigating how they overlap and come into being,
it is assumed that researchers can understand how power and organizational processes
are generated [10,12].
K.Cresswell /UsingActor-NetworkTheory toStudyHealth InformationTechnology Interventions 89
zurück zum
Buch Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners"
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Titel
- Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
- Untertitel
- Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Autoren
- Philip Scott
- Nicolette de Keizer
- Andrew Georgiou
- Verlag
- IOS Press BV
- Ort
- Amsterdam
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-61499-991-1
- Abmessungen
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Seiten
- 242
- Kategorie
- Informatik