Seite - (000371) - in Knowledge and Networks

369 so, we have already taken into consideration factors that go beyond dyadic relation- ships, factors such as network characteristics. Extending this dimension in future research will help improve the understanding of the dynamics of cooperation net- works at the core of clusters and of local and regional innovation systems. References Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455. doi:10.2307/2667105 Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011 Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49, 907–920. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.883598 Balland, P.-A., de Vaan, M., & Boschma, R. A. (2013). The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video games industry, 1987–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 741–765. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs023 Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in real networks. Science, 286, 509–512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 [ISSN No. 1095–9203] Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2011). Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on pat- ent quality: The case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation. European Management Journal, 29, 362–376. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2011.03.001 Benner, M., & Waldfogel, J. (2008). Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Research Policy, 37, 1556–1567. doi:10.3386/w13322 Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887 Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. In R. A. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–136). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781849806497.00012 Broekel, T. (2015). The co-evolution of proximities—A network level study. Regional Studies, 49, 921–935. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.1001732 Broekel, T., Balland, P.-A., Burger, M., & van Oort, F. (2014). Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: A discussion of four empirical strategies. The Annals of Regional Science, 53, 423–452. doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0616-2 Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. A. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 409–433. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr010 Cantner, U., Conti, E., & Meder, A. (2010). Networks and innovation: The role of social assets in explaining firms’ innovative capacity. European Planning Studies, 18, 1937–1956. doi:10.108 0/09654313.2010.515795 Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social net- work analysis. Research Policy, 35, 463–480. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002 Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2011). Innovation networks: Formation, performance and dynamics. In C. Antonelli (Ed.), Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change (pp. 366–394). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Cantner, U., & Meder, A. (2007). Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partners. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2, 45–65. doi:10.1007/ s11403-007-0018-y Cantner U., Meder, A., & Wolf, T. (2011). Success and failure of firms’ innovation co-operations: The role of intermediaries and reciprocity. Papers in Regional Science, 90, 313–329. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00366.x 16 Coevolution of Innovative Ties, Proximity, and Competencies