Seite - 172 - in Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind - Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz

STEPHIE FEHR 172 Motha, Stewart (2007): »Veiled Women and the Affect of Religion in Society«. Journal of Law and Society 34, S. 139-162. Sandberg, Russell (2007): »Flags, Beards and Pilgrimages: A Review of the Early Cases on Religious Discrimination«. Ecclesiastical Law Journal 9, S. 87-100. Taylor, Stephen/Emir, Astra (2006): Employment Law, Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. Vickers, Lucy (2003): »The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regu- lations 2003«. Industrial Law Journal 32, S. 188-193. Weller, Paul/Feldman, Alice/Purdam, Kingsley (2001): Religious Discrimina- tion in England and Wales, University of Derby: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Unit. Yuval-Davis, Nira (2007): »Intersectionality, Citizenship and Contemporary Politics of Belonging«. Critical Review of International Social and Poli- tical Philosophy 10, S. 562-574. Rechtsprechung Azmi v. Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council EAT Case No.9/2007 (8 March 2007). R (on the application of Begum) v. Headteachers and Governors of Denbigh High School UKHL 15 2006 (22 March 2006). Kingston and Richmond RHA v. Kaur [1981] IRLR 337 (EAT). Mandla v. Dowell Lee [1983] IRLR 209 (HL). Mohmed v. Virgin Trains WL 25224803 (30 August 2006). Singh v. British Rail Engineering [1986] ICR 22 (EAT). Singh v. Rowntree Mackintosh [1979] IRLR 199 (EAT Sc). Williams v. South Central Limited, ET Case No.2306989/2003 (16 June 2004). Panesar v. Nestlé, [1980] IRLR 60.