Web-Books
im Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
International
Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Seite - 298 -
  • Benutzer
  • Version
    • Vollversion
    • Textversion
  • Sprache
    • Deutsch
    • English - Englisch

Seite - 298 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options

Bild der Seite - 298 -

Bild der Seite - 298 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options

Text der Seite - 298 -

298 W.J.WouterBotzenet al. Fig.12.6 Net Present Value (bars, left axis) and normalised Benefit/cost ratio (diamonds, right axis) of flood risk adaptationmeasures forHoChiMinhCity for three combinations of climate changeandsocio-economicscenariosRCP4.5andSSP2,RCP8.5andSSP5,RCP8.5High-Endand SSP5,until theyear2100.Note:discount rate is2.5%. SourceScussolini et al. (2017) Thedevelopmentofnewfloodriskprotectionstandardsfor theNetherlandsillus- trates theuseofCBAincombinationwithother considerations and indicators (see Box12.2).Thecasebelowalso illustrateshowtheapplicationofCBAindesigning region-specific protection standards reduced protection investment costs in com- parison to an earlier official proposal for a nation-wide uniform update of the old standards. There are alternatives to CBA that can be applied. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is amethod that can be applied to identify least-cost options tomeet a cer- tain, pre-defined target or policy objective, for example, a certain safety standard. CEAcanalsobeused if thebenefitsofalternativeoptionsareassumedtobesimilar enoughthat thechoicebetweenoptionscanbemadeonthecostdimension.Theuse ofCEA is appropriate if the benefits of alternative options arefixedor pre-defined (suchas reducingdisaster fatalities or losses to apre-defined level).Theadvantage of CEA is that it does not require tomonetise the benefits of options, such as the monetary benefits of avoiding health or environmental impacts of floods. The dis- advantage of CEA is that it cannot determine whether an option is economically efficient, i.e.whether its benefits exceed its costs.Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is another decision-supportmethod that can be used in certain circumstances.MCA providesa structuredwayofcomparingbenefitsandcosts that areexpressed indif- ferent units. For example, benefitsmaybe expressed in “number of lives saved”or a qualitative indicator of landscape or environmental quality.MCA is sometimes
zurück zum  Buch Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options"
Loss and Damage from Climate Change Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Titel
Loss and Damage from Climate Change
Untertitel
Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Autoren
Reinhard Mechler
Laurens M. Bouwer
Thomas Schinko
Swenja Surminski
JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer
Verlag
Springer Open
Datum
2019
Sprache
englisch
Lizenz
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-319-72026-5
Abmessungen
16.0 x 24.0 cm
Seiten
580
Schlagwörter
Environment, Climate change, Environmental law, Environmental policy, Risk management
Kategorien
International
Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima
Web-Books
Bibliothek
Datenschutz
Impressum
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Loss and Damage from Climate Change