Seite - 106 - in >mcs_lab> - Mobile Culture Studies, Band 2/2020

106 Mobile Culture Studies. The Journal 6 2o20 (Travel) Anna Karina Sennefelder | Revival of the cultural stereotype? Moreover, this ‘intensity’ is merely tautologically justified (“the hard life is lived just as it is”). In this sequence, undifferentiated stereotyping of cultures, colonialistically influenced discourse patterns and personal confessions of long cherished desires overlap. The fact that Wendt talks of ‘magical attraction’ and of symbolic ‘steps on African ground’ shows all the more clearly that the problem of certain terms, for example with regard to German colonial history, is ignored in favour of the representation of one’s own subjective emotionality. Conclusion The multimodal analyses of the two personalised travel documentaries, Weit and Reiss aus, have revealed that there is an initial special relationship between filmmakers and viewers, because the ‘consumers’ of the films are also private ‘producing financers’. Arguably, the film- makers are even more concerned with delivering signals for a ‘documentary reading’ of their film than filmmakers in other producing contexts. I argue that the digital prosumer-culture creates a certain dependency and may be one reason why films such as Weit and Reiss aus avoid reflecting on European travel privileges. Instead, they reinforce cultural stereotypes, such as the contrast between capitalist driven, ill making societies in the ‘West’, opposed to the ‘hard, but more valuable life’ in ‘Africa’ or the ‘great aura’ of people wearing turbans and beards. Both films could have dealt with the travellers’ privileges, like having the right passport and the necessary financial and social capital to be able to ‘simply travel away’ from burn-out or boredom of routines. They could have reflected on the multiple misbalances between them- selves — young, able-bodied white Europeans and members of the global North — and the inhabitants of the regions they travelled to. They could have located themselves within the postcolonial discourse, but they chose not to. They brought up neither the different possibilities of “relating to culture in general” (Hasters 2019: 92) from a postcolonial perspective, nor the Fig. 12–15: Reiss aus, ‘Africa-motives’, 23:25–24:04