Seite - 140 - in Mobile Culture Studies - The Journal, Band 3/2017

140 Mobile Culture Studies. The Journal 3 2o17 Patrick Naef | Using mobility and urban planning to implement atmosphere potential encounter zones. Finally, it is stated here that in contrast to the very technical issues of urban planning, a debate on atmospheres – considered as intrinsically dynamic and ever- changing – can help to integrate the inhabitants and users into the decision-making process. References Adey, Peter. 2014. ‘Security atmospheres or the crystallisation of worlds’, Environment and Plan- ning D: Society and Space, 32, 834-851 Ben-Joseph, Eran. 2007. ‘Changing the Residential Street Scene: Adapting the shared street (Woonerf) Concept to the Suburban Environment’, Journal of the American Planning Associa- tion, 61(4), 504-515 Bissel, David. 2010. ‘Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public trans- port’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 270-289 Böhme, Gernot. 1993. ‘Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of new aesthetics’, thesis, 36, 113-126 Buser, Michael. 2014. ‘Thinking through nonrepresentational and affective atmospheres in plan- ning theory and practice’, Planning Theory, 13(3) 227-243 Canton du Valais. 2014. ‘Concept cantonal de développement territorial’, (Sion  : Département de mobilité, du territoire et de l’environnement) <https://www.vs.ch/web/sdt/concept-canto- nal-de-developpement-territorial1> [Accessed 2017-05-01] Canton du Valais. 1987. ‘Plan directeur cantonal’, (Sion  : Département de mobilité, du territoire et de l’environnement) <https://www.vs.ch/web/sdt/le-plan-directeur-cantonal> [Accessed 2017- 05-01] CEREMA. ‘Cinq ans après la mise en place des zones de rencontre, quel bilan?’, Techni.Cités, 269 (2017) <http://www.territoires-ville.cerema.fr/IMG/pdf/Cinq-ans-apres-la-mise-en-place-des- ZdR_cle0f48f1.pdf> [Accessed 2017-04-21] Clark Emma. 2006. ‘The evolution of shared space’, Traffic Engineering and Control, 290-292 CABE. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. 2007. Living with risk. Pro- moting better public space design (London: CABE), <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. uk/20110118111213/http://www.cabe.org.uk/files/living-with-risk-full.pdf> Elvik, Rune. 2001. ‘Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effects’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(3), 327-336 Duarte, Cristiane Rose. 2013. ‘Ambiance  : pour une approche sensible de l’espace’, in Thibaud, Jean-Paul, and, Cristiane Rose Duarte, eds., Ambiances urbaines en partage : pour écologie sociale de la ville sensible, (Genève  : MetisPresses), 21-29 Gehl, Jan. 2010. Cities for people. (Washington, DC: Island Press) Gerlach, Jürgen, Methorst, Rob, Boenke, Dirk, and Leven, Jens. ‘Sense and nonsense of shared Space. A contribution to make a popular design philosophy more objective’, Fietsberaad Crow. (2008) <http://www.fietsberaad.nl/?lang=nl&repository=Sense+and+Nonsense+of+Shared+Space> [Accessed 2017-05-04] Grotenhuis, Dirk H.T. 1979. The Woonerf in City-and Traffic Planning (Deft: Chief Traffic Department Public Works Services Municipality)