Seite - 247 - in Pflegeroboter

24713 Robotik in der Gesundheitsversorgung: Hoffnungen, Befürchtungen … Hielscher, V., Kirchen-Peters, S., & Sowinski, C. (2015). Technologisierung der Pflegearbeit? Pflege & Gesellschaft, 20, 5–19. http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drug-topics/news/chan- ging-face-pharmacy?page=full. Zugegriffen: 9. Febr. 2018. Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sus- tainable Energy Reviews, 16(2012), 525–531. Klein, B., Gaedt, L., & Cook, G. (2013). Emotional robots. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontop- sychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 89–99. Kort, H., & Huisman, C. (2017). Care robot ZORA in Dutch nursing homes; An evaluation study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 242, 527–534. Kuo, I. H., Rabindran, J. M., Broadbent, E., Lee, Y. I., Kerse, N., Stafford, R. M. Q., & MacDo- nald, B. A. (2009). Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots. The 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication Toyama, Japan, Sept. 27–Oct. 2, 2009. Lau, Y. Y., Hof, C. van’t, & Est, R. van. (2009). Beyond the surface. An exploration in healthcare robotics in Japan. The Hague: Rathenau Institute. Liang, A., Piroth, I., Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Fisher, M., Nater, U. M., Skoluda, N., & Bro- adbent, E. (2017). A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with Dementia living in the community. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18, 871–878. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.019. Lucke, D. (1995). Akzeptanz. Legitimität in der „Abstimmungsgesellschaft“. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J., & Elsner, B. (2015). Electromechanical and robot-as- sisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(11). doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub4. Meyer, S., & Fricke, C. (2016). Roboter-Companions für die Schlaganfall-Therapie – Akzeptanz- untersuchungen mit 80 Patienten in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. Zukunft Lebensräume Kongress 2016 (S. 16–24). Frankfurt: Kongressband VDE, Berlin: Offenbach. Nam, K. Y., Kim, H. J., Kwon, B. S., Park, J.-W., Lee, H. J., & Yoo, A. (2017). Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14, 24. doi: https://doi. org/10.1186/s12984-017-0232-3. Nejat, G., Sun, Y., & Nies, M. (2009). Assistive robots in health care settings. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 21, 177–187. Olushola, T., & Abiola, J. O. (2017). The efficacy of technology acceptance model: A review of applicable theoretical models in information technology researches. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 4, 70–83. Saurenmann, R., & Casada, K. (2017). Using robots and an IoT solution, Avatarion helps sick chil- dren stay connected. Microsoft technical case studies. https://microsoft.github.io/techcasestu- dies/iot/2017/04/04/avatarion.html. Zugegriffen: 9. Febr. 2018. Schäfer, M., & Keppler, D. (2013). Modelle der technikorientierten Akzeptanzforschung. Überblick und Reflexion am Beispiel eines Forschungsprojekts zur Implementierung innovativer techni- scher Energieeffizienz-Maßnahmen. Disscussion paper Nr. 34/2013, Technische Universität Berlin, Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft, Berlin. Sederstrom, J. (2015). The changing face of pharmacy. Survey finds changes in demographics, responsibilities, and satisfaction levels. Drug Topics, 10(Juni). Swinnen, E., Lefeber, N., Willaert, W., Neef, F. De, Bruyndonckx, L., Spooren, A., Michielsen, M., Ramon, T., & Kerckhofs, E. (2017). Motivation, expectations, and usability of a driven gait orthosis in stroke patients and their therapists. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 24, 299–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1266750.